Well..I'm sure the South viewed it as a positive thing. The North, of course, abhorred it. They began to worry that slavery was, indeed, legal in the North. They also began to worry that slaves in the South would soon have very few (if any) rights at all.
This case came at a very tender time in the US, as slavery was a hot topic of all the elections, and a source of major conflict between the North and South. The rulings of this court case blew all previous conflicts out of the water, and set forth a new wave of bitter disagreement.
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
The Dred Scott Decision helped lead to the Civil War because it caused fighting between the North and South. The North was angry because people in the north had decided not to allow slavery in their states, and the Dred Scott decision allowed slaves to be brought into their states. The Dred Scott decision basically said that if a slave was brought to a free state they were still a slave because they were property. so even a free state wasn't really free. Most southerners were happy with the decision because it allowed them to take slaves with them to free states and territories and reinforced the idea that slaves had no rights as U.S. citizens. Dred Scott's case caused more trouble between the North and South.
If you're doing the crossword, the Dred Scott descision.
They embraced the decision. It verified their view of a slave society.
It is likely that the Dred Scott decision had little direct effect on the Civil War. However, it is may be that the South felt more justified to pursue the war because of the decision.
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
dred Scott is African
The Dred Scott decision declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and ruled that slaves were property. The decision did not necessarily alarm most people in the North.
The Dred Scott Decision helped lead to the Civil War because it caused fighting between the North and South. The North was angry because people in the north had decided not to allow slavery in their states, and the Dred Scott decision allowed slaves to be brought into their states. The Dred Scott decision basically said that if a slave was brought to a free state they were still a slave because they were property. so even a free state wasn't really free. Most southerners were happy with the decision because it allowed them to take slaves with them to free states and territories and reinforced the idea that slaves had no rights as U.S. citizens. Dred Scott's case caused more trouble between the North and South.
it was a slave sueing for his freedom and lost. the aboltionist in north were shocked and it also said Congress can not ban slavery in teritorys
The Dred Scott decision of 1857 did benefit proponents of slavery as it ruled that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not entitled to U.S. citizenship. This decision reinforced the institution of slavery at the time and further deepened the divide between the North and South on the issue.
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
If you're doing the crossword, the Dred Scott descision.
The South generally supported the Dred Scott decision because it upheld the rights of slaveowners to take their slaves into any territory. They saw it as a victory for states' rights and slaveholding interests.
That the Supreme Court decision was both unnecessary and invalid.
Southerners benefited the most from the Dred Scott Decision.
They embraced the decision. It verified their view of a slave society.