The Declaration of Independence and the constitution.
The Constitution
protection
Progressives pushed for changes in city governments in order to fight the old "machine politics of Gilded Age.
The branch of legislative is the branch that makes the laws. The one that protects rights and freedoms of the citizens aren't in one of the branches, but it is called the Bill of Rights. (It has nothing to do with money)
The governments should provide their citizens with all their human and universal rights as described by the constitution. All governments for instance are supposed to guarantee the safety of their citizens.
Governments may have the power to limit certain rights of their citizens during wartime in order to protect national security and ensure public safety. This is often done through measures such as censorship, curfews, and restrictions on freedom of speech. However, it is important for governments to balance these limitations with respect for individual rights and the rule of law.
The necessity for a written constitution to define citizens' rights and to limit the governments power.
They both suggest that governments should most importantly insure and protect the rights of their citizens.
YES!
To protect citizens rights which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Sadly, by retaining their right to bear arms against their governments when they become tyrannical.
widespread use by the Civil Rights Movement in the court pathway How Governments treated citizens of different races(:
People who favor states' rights feel that state governments can serve their people better than the national government can. State governments, they argue, should be able to fit laws and programs to the particular needs of their citizens.
Only if they are limiting them for their safety and benefit.
The 14th amendment requires state governments to give their citizens the same rights that the federal government does. Before the 14th amendment, the state governments had almost unlimited authority over their citizens.
To what extent should governments attempt to balance the promotion of individual and collective rights?