answersLogoWhite

0

No, but Lincoln suspended habeas corpus, FDR created internment camps,

and Bush wants to authorize "no warrant" wiretaps.

User Avatar

Wiki User

17y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What do all governments provide their citizens with?

The governments should provide their citizens with all their human and universal rights as described by the constitution. All governments for instance are supposed to guarantee the safety of their citizens.


Should governments have the power to limit the rights of their citizens during wartime?

Governments may have the power to limit certain rights of their citizens during wartime in order to protect national security and ensure public safety. This is often done through measures such as censorship, curfews, and restrictions on freedom of speech. However, it is important for governments to balance these limitations with respect for individual rights and the rule of law.


The state governments set up during the revolution reflected the American belief in the?

The necessity for a written constitution to define citizens' rights and to limit the governments power.


What do both the US declaration of independence and the french declaration of the rights of man emphasize about the government?

They both suggest that governments should most importantly insure and protect the rights of their citizens.


Should government have the power to limit the rights of their citizens during war time?

YES!


What are governments purposes?

To protect citizens rights which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.


How do citizens ensure that their governments allow them to have rights?

Sadly, by retaining their right to bear arms against their governments when they become tyrannical.


What did the equal protections clause apply to?

widespread use by the Civil Rights Movement in the court pathway How Governments treated citizens of different races(:


What is an argument used by those who favor states' rights?

People who favor states' rights feel that state governments can serve their people better than the national government can. State governments, they argue, should be able to fit laws and programs to the particular needs of their citizens.


Should government have the power to limit the rights of their citizens during wartime?

Only if they are limiting them for their safety and benefit.


Which amendment has been interpreted to extend the provision of the natural bill of rights?

The 14th amendment requires state governments to give their citizens the same rights that the federal government does. Before the 14th amendment, the state governments had almost unlimited authority over their citizens.


Should governments attempt to balance the promotion of individual and collective rights?

To what extent should governments attempt to balance the promotion of individual and collective rights?