0
- Only as a last alternative. Otherwise no! The U.S. is under the impression they can't be beat (they have been once re Vietnam) and were attacked on native soil by terrorists. There are those in the rest of the world that would retaliate if the U.S. attacked them first.
- No. The USA do not want any more innocent lives lost, that's why they banned nuclear warfare. Instead, the rely on high tech surgical warfare using highly advanced weapons to accurately destroy the 'real' opponents rather than sacrificing innocent lives through weapons of mass destruction and risking the end of the world.
- Also the USA can be beat, if they lost against the Viet Cong then they could loose to most countries. The USA think they control the world. Britain is most likely the country not to beat in a war (a war not an atomic war) because all they have to defend is a small island and Britain haven't lost a war in over 200 years.
What else can I help you with?
Licenses and regulates all civilian facilities and the civilian use of nuclear materials?
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
What caused the United States to join the Allies in fighting World War 1?
the Germans' use of unrestricted submarine warfare
Do you use affect or effect in this sentence That documentary on the Civil War had a profound affect on your view of the nature of warfare?
You say 'profound effect'
What kind of warfare did the battle of concord use?
The Battle of Concord was fought in guerrilla warfare style with colonists sniping from behind rocks and trees at the British soldiers as they marched from Concord back to Boston. The British were more used to fighting in open fields with the armies facing each other in long fronts. The British were on a single road in column formation in the open while the colonists shot from concealed positions.
What tatics did the colonists use against the British troops on their march back from Concord to Boston?
They ambushed the retreating British forces and fought covering themselves in the woods and behind stone walls using a tactic like a guerrilla warfare.
Why was there nuclear warfare?
There has not been nuclear warfare. There have been two nuclear attacks. Nuclear warfare denotes the use of nuclear weapons by both or all opposing sides. The only use of nuclear weapons in warfare were the two bombings by the US of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and it was the intent of the US to bring WW2 with Japan to a quicker conclusion.
Do you think That Muslims should use nuclear bombs?
I believe no one should use nuclear weapons.
Movie featuring Byron nuclear plant?
(China Syndrome) and ( Silkwood) dealt with Nuclear-power safety issues- quite distinct from nuclear warfare, bomb scares and possible terrorist use.
What is the purpose of nuclear warfare?
The purpose of nuclear warfare primarily lies in deterrence, as nations possess nuclear weapons to prevent adversaries from engaging in aggressive actions due to the fear of catastrophic retaliation. Additionally, some states may view nuclear capabilities as a means to assert power and influence on the global stage. However, the actual use of nuclear weapons is often seen as a last resort due to the devastating humanitarian and environmental consequences they entail. Ultimately, the existence of nuclear warfare raises complex ethical and security dilemmas in international relations.
What can you do to prevent the use of nuclear weapons?
Unless you are involved in governmental policy making, which most of us are not, the second best way to prevent the use of nuclear weapons is to raise awareness of the dangers of nuclear warfare and hopefully that will cause sufficient interest so that the government will act accordingly.
What is the history of chemical and nuclear warfare?
The first official chemical warfare started in WWI when the military threw bombs containing ammonia to the other side. The ammonia was mass produced through a new method called the Heiber process. The inventor got a Nobel Prize but his wife killed herself at the thought that his process killed so many people. The nuclear warfare began with US dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Since then, the nuclear war developed to a horrible extent. The Czar bomb, which is said to be the strongest weapon of mass destruction ever tested, sent shock waves around the globe three times before it died down.
What are things that can be considered like Pandora's box?
The discovery , development , use and proliferation of nuclear weapons , the development of bacteriological warfare coming from laboratories ,
Which ps3 speaker should you use for modern warfare 2?
yo should use surroud sound because it enhances the game.
Should you use nuclear power in the future?
Certainly yes
What is thermonuclear warfare?
Thermonuclear warfare is the use of nuclear weapons in war, either tactically or strategically. Although the term "thermonuclear" technically applies only to the process of fusion, the term is loosely applied to conflict involving fission weapons, fusion weapons, or both (informal synonyms are "atomic war" or "nuclear war").
Why should we stop nukes?
Your question makes the assumption that "nukes" should be stopped. Nuclear weapons were developed to provide overwhelming military force. The case can and has been made that nuclear weapons are a necessity in preventing the use of force by other nations. While this is not a popular view among many people, the argument can be made that it is a realistic viewpoint.
Would the US ever use nuclear weapons?
If provoked again due to a pre-emptive attack on our homeland, the USA would inot hesitate to use nuclear warheads on another country.
