No. It could been averted if California had been divided into two states - North California (free) and South California (slave), meeting on the Missouri line. The Missouri Compromise could then have continued to keep the peace, as it had for thirty years.
It would depend on which civil war you are referring to.
This means that the civil war was brutal .....
civil war can go in a sentence in many ways - I have some money from the civil war - my friend's great great grandfather fought in the civil war - the civil war was fought over rights for African Americans
You need to specify whether you mean the English Civil War or the American Civil War.
No he did not fight in the Civil War
American Civil War: 1861-1865Mexican Civil War: 1858-1861Irish Civil War: 1922-1923Russian Civil War: 1917-1921Chinese Civil War: 1928-1937, 1945-1949Austrian Civil War: February 12 - February 16, 1934Spanish Civil War: 1936-1939
It would depend on which civil war you are referring to.
*The civil war *The War between the States
a civil war the civil war was the north vs. south of one country
civil war
Do you mean the Spanish Civil War or the American Civil War?
Yes, it actually was a civil war :P
The Civil War (1861-1865) The Civil War was fought between the Union (north) and the Confederacy (south). The war was fought mainly about the issue of slavery. The Union eventually won and that is what makes us the United States of America today.
The Civil War
Civil War
In Civil War
the Mason Dixon line separated North & South in the US Civil war