answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Not the immediate cause - it had been a long-running debate.

The immediate cause was Lincoln's election victory on a ticket of no new slave-states.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Was the issue of slavery in the territories divides the north and south the immediate cause that spark the set off of the US Civil War?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Was the Battle of Vicksburg dealing with stealing land from Mexico?

Only in the remote sense that the Civil War was a result of aquiring land from Mexico in the Mexican War, forcing Congress to deal with the expansion of slavery nto the new territories, but there was no immediate causation.


Is it the right of the people to have slavery or not have it as they see fit in the territories?

The issue of slavery was a contentious one in the territories during the mid-19th century. The question of whether slavery should be allowed or prohibited in the territories was a central debate leading up to the Civil War. Ultimately, the issue was settled through legislation such as the Missouri Compromise and the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which aimed to address the spread of slavery into new territories.


What was the issue of slavery decided in the territory ceded by Mexico?

Former Mexican territories were supposed to ban slavery, except Texas. This was defined ion the Wilmot Proviso (1846). However, it was not enforced, and caused further divisions between pro-slavery states and the North. It resulted in the American Civil War (1861-1865).


Which situation was an immediate result of the US Civil War?

An immediate result of the US Civil War was the abolition of slavery with the ratification of the 13th Amendment to the US Constitution in 1865. This amendment legally ended slavery and involuntary servitude throughout the United States.


What event determined the status of slavery in territories in the 1850s?

The event that determined the status of slavery during the 1850s was the Wilmot Proviso. It was also a major cause of the Civil War.


What was the immediate cause of the secession of southern states before the civil war?

Well slavery was a big part of the southern secession.


How did civil war start?

The Civil War started because of uncompromising differences between the free and slave states over the power of the national government to prohibit slavery in the territories that had not yet become states


What did pre civil war abolitionists support?

The Wilmot Proviso, which declared that slavery should not be allowed in any of the new territories acquired from Mexico.


What were the central aspects of sectionalism and the slavery debate from the Mexican war to the US Civil War?

The Mexican-War reignited the slavery question, as many of the acquired lands from Mexico became pro-slavery states territories. For example, Texas and New Mexico became pro-slavery while California and Utah didn't. Ultimately, this led to the American Civil War.


What latitude became the northern boundary of slavery and its territories?

The Mason-Dixon Line, located at approximately 39 degrees latitude, became the northern boundary of slavery and its territories in pre-Civil War America. This line separated free states in the North from slave states in the South.


What was the legal impact of Dred Scott v. Sandford on the issue of slavery in the territories?

The Dred Scott v. Sandford decision ruled that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, did not have rights as citizens, and that Congress could not prohibit slavery in the territories. This decision further polarized the nation on the issue of slavery and heightened tensions leading up to the Civil War.


Did north like slavery?

In the beginning they didnt mind but further and further closer to the Civil war they saw it as immoral. Especially when the south wanted to extend slavery to the new western territories that the U.S gained from Mexico.