North of that line, slavery was illegal in all the territories of the Louisiana Purchase, according to the Missouri Compromise.
The acquisition of the new territories from Mexico required a new Compromise (1850) and this one did not work.
Stephen Douglas of Illinois proposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which allowed the people of each state to vote whether to be slave or free. The voting in Kansas caused bloodshed, and it was not tried again. But the imminent Civil War would spell the end of slavery throughout the USAin any case.
It would allow slavery to spread north of the line established by the Missouri compromise. - Novanet
The Missouri Compromise was used to please both pro and anti-slavery people from the North and South with a regulation that prohibited slavery in some states and allowed it in other.
True
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was a compromise between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in Congress agreeing to prohibit slavery in states north of the parallel 36°30' north except in the state of Missouri. Additionally, the state of Maine was allowed to join the Union as a free state. This compromise was passed due to concerns of the creation of the state of Missouri destroying the delicate balance between slave states and free states in Congress.
both the Missouri compromise of 1820 and the compromise of 1850 settled conflicts between the north and the south over
The Missouri Compromise splits the early America into the South (where slavery is upheld) and the North ( Where slavery is banned)
It would allow slavery to spread north of the line established by the Missouri compromise. - Novanet
no because after the Missouri compromise it was prohibited to have slaves north of Missouri
The Missouri Compromise - No slavery North of the parallel 36.30
there was no slavery allowed
No - in the North. It banned slavery anywhere North of the parallel that marked Missouri's Southern border. This was a successful compromise which kept the peace for thirty years.
Slavery. It established a parallel, North of which slavery was illegal.
An advantage to the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was that slavery would not be permitted in the territory that is now the state of Missouri. A disadvantage to the Missouri Compromise was that people who believed in slavery in the South could not move north to gain more land and keep their slaves.
The Missouri Compromise was passed in 1820 and was a set of agreements between those who were against slavery and those who were for it. It forbade slavery north of the 36th parallel, except where designated in Missouri.
It allowed Slavery in the north.
The Missouri Compromise was a temporary band aid on the problem of slavery. Many in the South wanted slavery and many in the North did not. It made more people unhappy.
It sounds like the Missouri Compromise, where slavery would be permitted 'not north' of Missouri's Southern border.