Both President Theodore Roosevelt and President Woodrow Wilson viewed Latin America through the lens of U.S. interests but had different approaches. Roosevelt believed in a more interventionist policy, exemplified by his "Big Stick" diplomacy, which justified using military force to maintain stability and protect U.S. interests. In contrast, Wilson advocated for moral diplomacy, promoting democracy and human rights while being more cautious about military intervention. Despite their differing methods, both presidents aimed to assert U.S. influence in the region.
United States influence in Latin America must be accepted by other countries
President Hoover introduced the "Good Neighbor Policy" and President Franklin Roosevelt later built upon it as part of his New Deal
it became more involved in dept problem in latin america (Apex)
Theodore Roosevelt changed U.S. policy toward Latin America through his implementation of the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, which asserted that the U.S. had the right to intervene in Latin American countries to maintain stability and order. This shift was motivated by a desire to prevent European intervention in the region and to assert American dominance as a regional power. Roosevelt's approach emphasized a more aggressive foreign policy, exemplified by his "speak softly and carry a big stick" philosophy, which aimed to protect U.S. interests while promoting stability in Latin America. This marked a significant transition from earlier policies of non-intervention and isolationism.
roosevelt corollary
sent troops to latin America
President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared the right of the United States to intervene in Latin America in his 1904 corollary to the Monroe Doctrine. This corollary, known as the Roosevelt Corollary, expanded on the original Monroe Doctrine and asserted the US's authority to intervene in Latin American countries to preserve stability and protect its interests.
President Roosevelt's policies towards Latin America, known as the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, aimed to assert U.S. dominance in the region. He intervened militarily in several countries and used U.S. economic power to exert influence. President Taft's policy of "dollar diplomacy" focused on using American investments to increase economic stability and secure U.S. interests. President Wilson pursued his policy of "watchful waiting," which involved supporting local revolutions and recognizing governments that aligned with U.S. interests. Overall, these policies led to increased U.S. intervention and influence in Latin America, often at the expense of Latin American sovereignty.
Opposed in Europe and Latin America.
yes. Roosevelt encouraged a revolution in Panama and sent some troop there to help it along. Wilson had special problems with Mexico which was in a constant state of revolution.
The U.S. should block outside interference with Latin America
Economic interests in the area
Theodore Roosevelt saw great investment opportunities for American business in Latin America and the Far East.
No. He favored governments that were aligned to American economic interests.
President Taft's dollar diplomacy kept Latin America dependent on foreign investment and aid. President Wilson, however, directly interfered with Mexican affairs, intervening more than his predecessors.
United States influence in Latin America must be accepted by other countries
kept the Europeans out of the western hemisphere.