Most New England farms and homes were surrounded by rock walls, as there was nothing else to do with the rocks once they were cleared from the land for farming. Most of the crops consisted of grains, corn, squash, beans, nuts, and fruits. The farms were small family farms, nothing commercial. Whaling was an important economic activity. Fishing and trade were also important. There was also some ship building and supplying supplies for ships. Trade with Great Britain became an important part of the area's economy, as well as smuggling goods with other nations.
Mercantilism
Hshxbx
Not only would the colonies have lost a lot of territory without New York and Virginia, the colonies would have lost a large percentage of it's population. The colonies would have also lost wealth and New York and Virginia were two of the wealthiest colonies.
german and scottish farmers
A key reason the Native population reduced by 1670 was the spread of disease, often smallpox.
Who were the key members in the new England colonies colony? what did they do?
King Henry the eighth changed England's religion.
spices
plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz answer me sm bodyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Lawrence Margolis has written: 'Key factors for economic success in industrial nations' -- subject(s): Economic development, Economic policy
The middle colonies allowed religious freedom, and went so far as to protect it by law.
The middle colonies allowed religious freedom, and went so far as to protect it by law.
The middle colonies allowed religious freedom, and went so far as to protect it by law.
The middle colonies allowed religious freedom, and went so far as to protect it by law.
Yes and No. One part of the series of laws was the Boston Port Act which did close Boston Harbor which was a key trade port in the colonies and one of the biggest in New England, so it did cut off trade from New England, and essentialy the north, from the south. It did not cut off trade between the American colonies and England the country.
Economic growth is just a key for development but not satisfactory indicator because its it does not consider the individual development of the mass of the member of state. It just explains the raise in per capital income which is at national levle and not individual level for incitance it does not explain about life expectance,human development index,physical quality of life index ect
Mercantilism