Federalists
A large amount of America's Christians and Quakers lived in the North in the past and were against slavery and abuses because of ethics.
Some northerners believed slavery was morally wrong. Southerners believed slavery was an essential part of their lives.
Briefly put, most Southerners wanted to continue the right to own slaves and most Northerners did not like the practice and did not want to see it extended to new states that came into the union. A fairly large number of Northerners were strongly against slavery and wanted to abolish it throughout the country as soon as possible. Some Southerners had objections to slavery but respected the right of others to keep their slaves.
During the time of the American Civil War, people who were against slavery were called 'Abolitionists'.
The southerners wanted slavery to end but northerners didn't want that
Northerners were completely against slavery, and before the Civil War they took their hatred overboard by killing Southerners for their slavery.
Most Northerners were not Abolitionists, and there was no particular name for them. As the war went on, the anti-war Democrats were called Copperheads. These were pro-slavery.
Yep, Not all had to be against slavery. They may have had their own veiws but they all had to obide by the laws for the North.
The Secession and the Confederate attack against Fort Sumter.
No- not all Southerners were pro-slavery, just like not all Northerners were anti-slavery.
Free Soilers
A large amount of America's Christians and Quakers lived in the North in the past and were against slavery and abuses because of ethics.
Some northerners believed slavery was morally wrong. Southerners believed slavery was an essential part of their lives.
Slavery was not much of a problem in the north so most northerners were against it uniting then into a union
Because most Northerners were against the extension of slavery, though they were prepared to accept it in its traditional heartlands.
No. Have you ever known any large, diverse group of people to be of a unified opinion about anything?
no.