2) Fifth Amendment right to a grand jury hearing (Grand Jury Clause of the Fifth Amendment);
3) The Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial in civil cases (Right of Trial by Jury Clause of the Seventh Amendment);
4) The Eighth Amendment right to excessive bail and fines (Excessive Bails and Fines Clauses of the Eighth Amendment).
In case you are interested, here is the list of constitutional provisions that have been incorporated and applied to the states, the cases that incorporated them, and the years in which they were incorporated by the Court:First Amendment
Freedom of Speech & Press: Gitlow v. New York(1925)
Freedom of Assembly: DeJonge v. Oregon (1937)
Freedom of Petition: Hague v. CIO (1939)
Free Exercise of Religion: Cantwell v. Connecticut(1940)
Establishment of Religion: Everson v. Board of Education(1947)
Second Amendment
Right to Keep & Bear Arms: McDonald v. Chicago(2010)
Fourth Amendment
Unreasonable Search & Seizure: Wolf v. Colorado(1949)
Exclusionary Rule: Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Fifth Amendment
Payment of Compensation for Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
the Taking of Private Property: Railroad Company v. Chicago (1897)
Right Against Self-Incrimination: Malloy v. Hogan(1964)
Right Against Double Jeopardy: Benton v. Maryland(1969)
When Double Jeopardy Attaches: Crist v. Bretz (1978)
Sixth Amendment
Right to Public Trial: In re Oliver (1948)
Right to Due Notice: Cole v. Arkansas (1948)
Right to Counsel (felonies): Gideon v. Wainwright(1963)
Confrontation &
Cross-Examination of Adverse
Witnesses: Pointer v. Texas (1965)
Right to Speedy Trial: Klopfer v. North Carolina(1967)
Compulsory Process to
Obtain Witnesses: Washington v. Texas (1967)
Right to Jury Trial
(In Criminal Cases): Duncan v. Louisiana (1968)
Right to Counsel
(Misdemeanor When
Jail is Possible): Argersinger v. Hamlin (1972)
Eight Amendment
Cruel & Unusual Punishment: Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber (1947)
Ninth Amendment
*Right to Privacy: Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)
*The word privacy does not appear in the Ninth Amendment (nor anywhere in the text of the Constitution). In Griswold, several members of the Court viewed the Ninth Amendment as guaranteeing (and incorporating) that right. Justice Douglas, writing the opinion of the Court in Griswold, and agreed to by seven other justices, stated that the right to privacy exists outside the enumerations of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Justice Douglas also created the penumbra theory of the right to privacy. The right to privacy was "created by several fundamental constitutional guarantees" which came together to show that privacy was, perhaps, inherent. (see Douglas, J., Opinion of the Court, Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).
-- Jesse Porter
(Any other U.S. Constitution questions, Second Amendment questions, Supreme Court case law, doctrines, standards, holdings, rulings, etc. questions, constitutionality of state and federal laws/statutes questions, or any political science questions, I would be more than willing to answer for you either here on Answers, my Facebook page, or you can even feel free to email me.
EXPECTED RESPONSE
Seventh Amendment (not incorporated)
ALSO QUALIFIES (Sort of)
Third Amendment (not fully incorporated)*
(*Technically, the Third Amendment also satisfies the criteria of the question because the case wasn't reviewed by the Supreme Court.)
Ninth Amendment (Not triable)
Tenth Amendment (Does not address individual rights)
(Incorporation really only applies to the first eight amendments of the Bill of Rights; however, the Ninth and Tenth Amendments are still considered part of the Bill of Rights)
Prior to June 28, 2010, Answer included:
Second Amendment (incorporated)
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Third Amendment (not fully incorporated)*
2nd Circuit ruling in Engblom v. Carey upheld Third Amendment rights, but decision only applies to Connecticut, New York, and Vermont. Decision only has persuasive authority over remainder of states.
(*Technically, the Third Amendment also satisfies the criteria of the question because the case wasn't reviewed by the Supreme Court.)
The United States Constitution is the fundamental legal document of the United States of America. It specifies the form the government takes, how the parts of governmet shall interact, the limits of governmental power, and the rights of individual citizens. You can read it here: http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.overview.HTML
Georgia, Louisisana, Mississippi and parts of Texas
they had not borne arms against the United States. they had not voluntarily fought against the United States.
Georgia, Louisisana, Mississippi and parts of Texas
because they wanted to split the country into lots of different parts
The US Supreme Court has applied most of the first eight amendments in the Bill of Rights to the States through the doctrine of "selective incorporation" primarily via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause.
What I think you mean is which parts have been made applicable to the states; the Bill of Rights was always applicable to the National Government.The following are the earliest U.S. Supreme Court cases declaring the specific sections of the Bill of Rights to be applicable to the States, and the year (in parenthesis) that the court decided the case.First Amendment - Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925)Second Amendment - McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 3020 (2010)The Supreme Court has never heard a case involving the third AmendmentFourth Amenment - Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)Fifth Amendment - Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 (1884)Sixth Amendment - In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257 (1948)Seventh Amendment - The Justices v. Murray, 76 U.S. 9 Wall. 274 (1869)Eighth Amendment - Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962)The Ninth Amendment originally applied to the states as it makes that which isn't granted to the federal government a states right or a right of the people.The Tenth Amendment originally applied to the states as it gives each state immunity from being sued in other courts, with some exceptions.
all protections in the bill of rights should apply to the states
CSV or Parts Incorporated
the Bill of Rights is part of the Constitution
The Declaration of Independence is broken up by parts. There's three parts. 1. Stresses the idea of natural rights, or rights that belong to all people from birth. 2. lists wrongs that led the Americans to break away from Britain. 3. announces that the colonies are the United States of America.
As an official state, it was always named Utah! But when the Mormon pioneers originally applied for statehood, the land area was much larger (covering parts of Idaho, Nevada, Wyoming, Colorado, and Arizona) and called "Deseret", which means honeybee.
The Northwest Territory was one of the first territories of the United States. It was incorporated in 1787 by the Northwest Ordinance. It consisted of all of modern-day Ohio, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, Indiana, and parts of Minnesota.
As the United States moved westward land was obtained. These territories desired to have the same rights and privileges of the original states. The Constitution allows of the addition of states.
The Fourteenth Amendment, adopted on July 9, 1868(following the Civil War), applied the priciples of the First Amendment and other parts of the Bill of Rights (applicable to Federal government) to State governments.
The Tenth Amendment, the last of the ten Amendments included in the Bill of Rights, ratified in 1791, says: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." However, the Constitution itself took away many of the rights of the individual States, which before then had been acting more as sovereign countries than as parts of a national government. By its terms, the Tenth Amendment did not affect what was already in the original part of the Constitution so it's not clear exactly what was left to the States.
Peasants rose up against their lords in parts of the central ans southern German states. They demanded the return of rights that the lords had usurped.