It is rejected since people feel it is unfair. A law was also passed saying it was banned.
Children in the middle colonies had jobs helping out on the farms. They would tend the animals and help with planting, weeding, and harvesting crops.
yes most children in the united states have to go to school to get an education
most, if not all, children during the 1700's did not go to school if they came from a poor family, only rich kids were able to go to school.
Children were required to attend school back in the 1800's.Mississippi was the last state to enact a compulsory attendance law in 1917.
On May 17, 1954, in their unanimous decision in the case of Brown vs. Board of Education (Oliver L. Brown, et al. vs. the Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, et al.), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the racial segregation of school students is unconstitutional. On May 18, 1896, in their decision in the case of Plessy vs. Ferguson, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that it is not a violation of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution to provide accommodations to whites only as long as accommodations of equal quality were also provided for blacks. This became known as the "separate but equal" doctrine. However, in the Brown v. Bd. of Ed. decision 58 years later, the Court determined that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal." "Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even though the physical facilities and other "tangible" factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities? We believe that it does... Segregation of white and colored children in public schools has a detrimental effect upon the colored children. The impact is greater when it has the sanction of the law, for the policy of separating the races is usually interpreted as denoting the inferiority of the negro group. A sense of inferiority affects the motivation of a child to learn. Segregation with the sanction of law, therefore, has a tendency to [retard] the educational and mental development of negro children and to deprive them of some of the benefits they would receive in a racial[ly] integrated school system... We conclude that, in the field of public education, the doctrine of "separate but equal" has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom the actions have been brought are, by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment." - U.S. Supreme Court, May 17, 1954
political reasons
Non-segregation would put children in physical danger.
An antibuser is a person who opposes the practice of busing - the transportation of children to school in order to achieve racial segregation.
Children who spend every other aspect of their lives together need not be separated in school.
Children who spend every other aspect of their lives together need not be separated in school.
distance or climate
rejected love
poverty is the main reason for children leaving the school before completion
According to the Supreme Court (in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas), segregation violates the 14th Amendment, which says, in part:"No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens... nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."This decision reversed the 1896 decision of Plessy v. Ferguson which ruled that 'seperate but equal' was not a violation. IN the Brown decision, the justices wrote that "seperate is inherently unequal", and therefore it did violate the 14th Amendment.
It allowed southern children to get an education, but segregation made it expensive.
Truancy laws and penalties were enforced.
Laws restricting child labor .