The two views were totally opposite to each other. When the Europeans landed they saw a land without ownership and with no fences . They came from places that land had been owned by someone for centuries and divided up. While the Native American views of land was that no one can own land, but they are to protect it and to make sure that the plants and animals were not waisted. The Europeans came without respect for the people who had been living on these lands for thousands of years. They brought foreign animals, plants, and insects with them practicing environmental terrorism on the native people . Forests were cut down and fenced off in an effort to create another England. The result was starvation, diseases, death and the removal of Native people from their ancestral lands.
Land and religion were two things that the Native Americans and European settlers fought over. The two groups had differing beliefs about land ownership and religion, and this sometimes resulted in conflict.
The first conflict in the all American slurp is when Lin's move to America they get invited to an American family and they had trouble eating the American buffet.
One of the advantages of the fur trade for Indians was that the Europeans supplied them with rifles. Fur was in high demand in Europe so Europeans were making a lot of profit. A disadvantage of the fur trade for the Europeans was that they had a lot of conflict with each other. A disadvantage for the Indians was that the Europeans took control over the fur trade.
The Spanish American war.
the taxes
Land and religion were two things that the Native Americans and European settlers fought over. The two groups had differing beliefs about land ownership and religion, and this sometimes resulted in conflict.
Cognitive conflict
CONFLICT THE CONFLICT ON IT WHEN TURKUNG LANGIT LOST HIS TEMPER.BECAUSE OF ALUNSINA ATTITUDE
Land and religion were two things that the Native Americans and European settlers fought over. The two groups had differing beliefs about land ownership and religion, and this sometimes resulted in conflict.
Conflict between First Nations and Europeans in Canada arose primarily due to differing views on land ownership and resource use. Europeans sought to expand their territories for agriculture, trade, and settlement, often disregarding Indigenous land rights and treaties. This led to displacement, resource depletion, and cultural disruptions for First Nations communities. Additionally, the imposition of European laws and systems further exacerbated tensions and misunderstandings between the two groups.
The Burmese generally viewed Europeans with a mix of curiosity, suspicion, and resentment. While some admired European technology and culture, others saw them as intrusive colonizers threatening their sovereignty and way of life. This ambivalence often led to a complex relationship marked by both collaboration and conflict, as the Burmese navigated their interactions with European powers. Overall, the attitude was shaped by historical contexts and individual experiences.
team work
Land and religion were two things that the Native Americans and European settlers fought over. The two groups had differing beliefs about land ownership and religion, and this sometimes resulted in conflict.
The growing European population in North America led to increased demand for land and resources, resulting in the encroachment on Native American territories. This expansion often disregarded existing treaties and indigenous rights, fueling tensions and conflicts. Additionally, the differing worldviews on land ownership and usage created misunderstandings and hostilities between the two groups. As Europeans settled more land, competition for resources intensified, leading to violent confrontations and a decline in Native American populations and cultures.
Americans attitudes toward the conflict in Europe
wars and sometimes treat
lies