i do not think so... the great powers from Western Europe had colonies (like France, England, Holland and so on)..
i think a country must be a naval power and also to have a strong army to be able to have colonies, which Bulgaria was not.
And the run for colonies started much earlier before Bulgaria was independent (1878)
my opinion: Bulgaria did not have colonies
200
Bulgaria
During World War 1 Great Britain possessed, among others, East Africa, Portugal and India. These colonies served as a source of supplies for the war, including soldiers.
German allies were Italy, Japan, Finland, Hungary, Rumania, and Bulgaria.
They helped by fighting with braveness.
Bulgaria fought on the side of Nazi Germany during the war.
Bulgaria was part of the axis during WW2.
Then, as now, Sofia.
Radoslavov
joined Germany
yes Axis
200
Part of its Western and Northern
specify pls. which war (s): Balkan war, inter-union war, world wars?
America was not against any colonies during ww1 or ww2 but it was war in the colonies like the Arabic colonies and the North African Colonies
Bulgaria was a constitutional monarchy during most of World War II with Tsar Boris III ruling with a Prime Minister and a Parliament. Prime Minister Bogdan Filov controlled the country with the Tsar Boris. They declared Bulgaria to be a neutral nation. I have provided a link for you below if you want to read more about Bulgaria during the war.
During the second World War, Germany, Japan, Italy, Romania, Hungary, and Bulgaria formed the Axis powers.