One reason was the advances made in weapons.
Artillery had been dramatically improved over the previous forty years. Artillery used to be a line-of-sight weapon. It had to be up with the foot soldiers and the artillerymen had to see what they were shooting at. If they could see what they were shooting at, what they were shooting at could also see them, and shoot back. Now artillery was powerful and reliable. These new cannon could fire at, and hit, targets miles away. A forward observer with a field telephone could call back to correct their aim. There were new powerful explosives to fill the shells, and accurate, reliable fuses to explode the shells when they were supposed to explode. All this was new. Each side had vast numbers of cannon behind their lines, to pound the enemy.
Every soldier now had a modern rifle. These were high powered weapons, with a range of up to a mile. They were extremely accurate, and lethal. A soldier had to work the bolt to reload after each shot, but a trained man in the British Army could fire 120 shots, aimed shots, per minute - two every second. Mostly they did not shoot that fast, but they could if they had to. In the earlier wars, such as the Napoleonic Wars or the American Civil War, a trained man did well to get off three shots per minute. The range of the old weapons was less. The old weapons fired black powder, and soon put a thick cloud over the battlefield, and it was hard to see anything to shoot at through the smoke. The new rifles used "smokeless" powder. And, the new weapons were rifles, not muskets. This meant they were far more accurate and had a much greater range.
Machine guns had been invented. These allowed defenders to mow down attacking troops in rows.
There was all this new weaponry, but the generals were old. Military thinking tends to be conservative - the innovators get in lots of trouble. If it was good enough for Napoleon, by God, its good enough for me. So the tactics the generals tried were the old ones, and got men slaughtered by the hundreds of thousands, when they went running at the enemy, who had accurate rifles, and machine guns. The WWI generals never learned.
Because both sides had these types of weapons, the defense was strongest. Thus, neither side could break through the enemy lines in any big way. But the generals kept trying, because they could think of nothing better to try.
Answer this question… Armies used advanced weaponry developed during the Industrial Revolution.
One of the primary reasons World War I was so much more destructive than earlier conflicts was the introduction of advanced military technology, such as machine guns, artillery, tanks, and chemical weapons. These innovations allowed for mass casualties on an unprecedented scale, as traditional tactics were often ineffective against the firepower of modern weaponry. Additionally, the extensive use of trench warfare led to prolonged stalemates and horrific conditions, further contributing to the war's high death toll and devastation.
World War I was more destructive than earlier conflicts due to the introduction of advanced technology and industrial warfare, including machine guns, tanks, and poison gas, which significantly increased the lethality of battles. The scale of the war also involved multiple major powers and massive armies, leading to unprecedented levels of casualties and destruction across vast fronts. Additionally, the entrenched warfare tactics and the use of artillery created a brutal stalemate, resulting in prolonged suffering and extensive devastation in the affected regions.
Well firstly two World Wars have taken place so far, World War I and World War II. World War I was from 1914 through to 1919. World War II lasted from 1939 to 1945.
World War I and the Treaty of Versailles didn't fix any of the problems going on the in world and even created more. World War II was fought over those old and new problems. So, yes, World War I caused World War II.
The use of tanks and aircrafts made World War 1 so destructive. Another reason was because there were so many countries involved.
Armies used advanced weaponry developed during the Industrial Revolution.
Answer this question… Armies used advanced weaponry developed during the Industrial Revolution.
One of the primary reasons World War I was so much more destructive than earlier conflicts was the introduction of advanced military technology, such as machine guns, artillery, tanks, and chemical weapons. These innovations allowed for mass casualties on an unprecedented scale, as traditional tactics were often ineffective against the firepower of modern weaponry. Additionally, the extensive use of trench warfare led to prolonged stalemates and horrific conditions, further contributing to the war's high death toll and devastation.
Throughout its duration, it was typically called the "Great War" or "World War". Sometimes it was nicknamed the "War to End All Wars", because it was so massively destructive.
what was one of the reason why the us has been so reluctant to intervene in world war 2
Which war? Probably because so many countries were involved and waging war at the same time for various and/or related reasons.
so we could not get killed so we could not get killed
they react so aggressively and almost lead to destructive war
A variety of reasons: patriotism, they were drafted, they wanted to be with their friends so they joined up as well.
Economy great depression and something else
World War II was the most destructive war in human history, first of all, because of the number of nations involved. Nations on nearly every continent took part, and its conflicts were waged on most of the world's land, seas, and air spaces. Another cause of the great destruction was the sophistication of the weapons involved, which never before had been utilized in war.