Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
During the middle ages, freedmen were likely farmers who rented land from feudal lords. Unlike the peasants or serfs, freemen were completely free to come and go as they please and earn as much income from their efforts as they were able to.
At the top were the nobility, which included the knights and had a hierarchy within it. Below them were the freemen, which were the middle class. Below them were serfs and villeins, who were not slaves, but also not quite free. A fourth group, the clergy, was quite apart and had a separate hierarchy of its own, though bishops were considered lords for many purposes, and clergy were considered commoners. There is a different four part hierarchy that is recorded in medieval Scottish law, consisting of nobility, freemen, serfs, and slaves. The slaves disappeared from Scotland during the High Middle Ages, however.
In practical effects, it did nothing. Serfs were bound to the land that they worked. When Tsar Alexander II issued the Emancipation Manifesto it freed the serfs but created economic conditions that made it impractical to leave. The Russian government took land from the owners but paid them for it. Then the serfs were required to repay the government with what were called "redemption payments." Typically, redemption took about 49 years. Serfs were free to leave but if they did leave they had no land to work. Many left for the cities to work in factories instead. If former serfs wanted to own their own farms, they had to pay the redemption payments first.
Serfdom was the basis of the Russian economy for hundreds of years. Many unsuccessful attempts were made to change things for the Serfs. The one successful event was Russian revolution in 1917. They overthrew the Tsar, introduced Communism and established the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics where all businesses were state owned and operated. It was subsequently argued that they became Serfs of the State rather than to the nobles.
the conditions stayed the same. <><><><><><><><><><><><>
Serfs were slaves tied to the land and lord and nothing would free them. Freemen were peasants who had bought their freedom.
Serfs and Freemen
True.
the lords, knights, kings, queens, serfs, and freemen got it the best
The villains were considered freemen among the serfs, but a subject under the king Both villains and serfs exchanged manual labor on the manors grounds for produce and rent. These conditions continued into the 15th century when tenure and free labor gained prominence.
They ruled the serfs/slaves ( serfs are slaves) and they lived well instead of in a dirt floor hut.
In secular society, the order was:Royalty at the topNobilityFree people, including merchants, tradesmen, and so onSerfsand sometimes there were slavesKnights, who were usually considered to be the lowest rank of nobility.Peasants included freemen, serfs and slaves. Freemen were independent farmers. Serfs were dependents of nobles or landed gentry, to whom they owed allegiance; serfs were not entirely free, but were not slaves either. Most countries did not have slaves.
No . Unlike serfs and freemen slaves did not have rights and were sold to higher ranked people like kings
Brewers were freemen, and were above serfs but below the nobility, in the middle class with other merchants and tradesmen.
Serfs gave crops to Lords and Lords controlled serfs' lives.
Serfs didn't make their lives into anything. They were basically a restricted, controlled, type of people, not enslaved, just not free to do as they pleased. They were legally bound to live and work on their land. The majority of the Serfs lives were revolved around the soils and farming.
The highest. The ranks in order from highest to lowest are: Kings and Queens Knights and Nobles Lesser Nobles Freemen and Freewomen Serfs