answersLogoWhite

0

TRUE! Feudalism is a series of complicated lord-and-vassal relationships between nobles, but the living conditions of serfs under the feudal system are hugely important to Western history. The overall squalor of the lives of the serfs (lower classes) contributed to the rapid spread of diseases like the black plague, the eventual re-emergence of major population centers, and the prevalence and importance of the Catholic church.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about World History

What best describes the Shang class systems?

lower classes were given plain burials


How was 16th century england like?

The upper classes were exposed to the New Learning, and were proud of their civilised status. The lower classes enjoyed a period of relative peace, though the destruction of the monasteries upset the religious certainties.


True or false. Every noble except for the lowest one on the social ladder was the suzerain of a lower noble?

True. Lords were also "vassals" of higher lords.


Was feudalism successful?

A plethora of reasons show that Feudalism was a positive influence in Europe. To illustrate, Feudalism restored trade. Before Feudalism, travel was difficult. Roads were bumpy and uneven. Often, thieves would steal many goods and sell them on the "Black Market." After Feudalism, lords oversaw the repair of trade routes, such as roads and bridges. Knights enforced the law, seizing bandits, and acting as local sheriffs. As a result, travel became easier and safer. Evidence shows that these little changes that Feudalism has brought caused trade to revive itself. Knights secured Western Europe and kept out invaders. It is clear that Feudalism encouraged trade and made people feel safer knowing that the knights were enforcing the laws. This positive attribute caused an increase in the economy and caused more people to have faith in Feudalism. Trade was vital to the success of a civilization. Trade brought items they had little of right at their fingertips. It also brought wealth to towns. During this time, a money system was not quite set up, so they bartered for items worth trading. This also brought more jobs. Trade made the middle class (merchants, farmers, artisans, crafters) wealthy. Therefore, towns were able to support a larger population with more jobs and more rare items available.


How many kings and queens where there in medieval times?

None.

Related Questions

Did Feudalism concerned the lower classes?

it concerned all of the classes.


Did feudalism concern lower classes?

it concerned all of the classes.


Was gandhi concerned about lower classes?

as Mohandas Ganghi concerned about his lower classes


Was feudalism concerned with the lower class?

Feudalism primarily focused on the relationships between the nobility and their vassals, with less direct concern for the lower class, which included peasants and serfs. While the system relied on the labor and loyalty of these lower classes for agricultural production and military support, their rights and well-being were often overlooked. The lower class was primarily bound to the land and subject to the obligations imposed by their lords, highlighting their subordinate role within the feudal hierarchy. Thus, feudalism was more concerned with maintaining power dynamics and obligations between the nobility than with addressing the needs of the lower class.


Who learned to read and write in both the upper and the lower class in Rome?

Every one in the upper classes learned to read and write and many of the lower classes also. However education was not free and because of the cost, many of the lower classes had an abbreviated education.Every one in the upper classes learned to read and write and many of the lower classes also. However education was not free and because of the cost, many of the lower classes had an abbreviated education.Every one in the upper classes learned to read and write and many of the lower classes also. However education was not free and because of the cost, many of the lower classes had an abbreviated education.Every one in the upper classes learned to read and write and many of the lower classes also. However education was not free and because of the cost, many of the lower classes had an abbreviated education.Every one in the upper classes learned to read and write and many of the lower classes also. However education was not free and because of the cost, many of the lower classes had an abbreviated education.Every one in the upper classes learned to read and write and many of the lower classes also. However education was not free and because of the cost, many of the lower classes had an abbreviated education.Every one in the upper classes learned to read and write and many of the lower classes also. However education was not free and because of the cost, many of the lower classes had an abbreviated education.Every one in the upper classes learned to read and write and many of the lower classes also. However education was not free and because of the cost, many of the lower classes had an abbreviated education.Every one in the upper classes learned to read and write and many of the lower classes also. However education was not free and because of the cost, many of the lower classes had an abbreviated education.


What were elected officials in ancient Rome and did they represent the lower class?

The elected officials who were supposed to represent the lower classes were the tribunes.The elected officials who were supposed to represent the lower classes were the tribunes.The elected officials who were supposed to represent the lower classes were the tribunes.The elected officials who were supposed to represent the lower classes were the tribunes.The elected officials who were supposed to represent the lower classes were the tribunes.The elected officials who were supposed to represent the lower classes were the tribunes.The elected officials who were supposed to represent the lower classes were the tribunes.The elected officials who were supposed to represent the lower classes were the tribunes.The elected officials who were supposed to represent the lower classes were the tribunes.


What are the four Greek social classes?

upper classes, lower classes , middle classes, and slaves


What are proletarians?

They are people who are part of the lower classes in society-working classes


How did feudalism effect the poor?

Feudalism significantly affected the poor by reinforcing a rigid social hierarchy that limited their mobility and opportunities. Peasants, often bound to the land they worked, faced heavy obligations to their lords, including labor and taxes, which left them with little to no resources for personal advancement. Their dependence on landowners for protection and sustenance meant they had little power or say in governance, perpetuating cycles of poverty and vulnerability. Overall, feudalism entrenched economic disparities and reduced the quality of life for the lower classes.


How did feudalism benefit the wealthy and powerful affect the poor?

Feudalism benefited the wealthy and powerful by consolidating land and resources in the hands of a few nobility, allowing them to maintain control over their vassals and peasants through a system of obligations and protections. This hierarchical structure ensured a steady flow of labor and tribute from the lower classes, which reinforced the wealth and status of the elite. Conversely, the poor, primarily serfs and peasants, were often bound to the land they worked, facing limited rights and opportunities for upward mobility, which perpetuated their dependence on their lords for protection and sustenance. As a result, while the nobility thrived, the lower classes remained marginalized and exploited within the feudal system.


What are the social classes in sumerian society and who was in each one?

The three social classes would be:the upper,middle,and lower classes upper classes included preists,kinds.landowners,merchants,and government officials. middle classes included all people who were free and the lower classes included Slaves.


can you Describe the conflict between lower and upper classes in Ancient Mesopotamia?

Describe the conflict between lower and upper classes in Ancient Mesopotamia