For sure Saudi Arabia, Nepal, Thailand, Korea, Japan, most of China, Mongolia (even though it was very closely alligned with the Soviet Union for quite some time) and if you don't count the war against Italy as occupation also Eritrea. Oh and apart from being fought against by the Soviet Union, Afghanistan was also never ruled by Europeans or the US until very recently.
If Europeans had never explored new lands, the course of history would have been drastically different. Indigenous cultures in the Americas, Africa, and Asia would likely have developed independently, leading to diverse civilizations without the influence of European colonization. Global trade networks would have evolved differently, potentially delaying technological advancements and globalization. Additionally, the rich exchange of ideas and resources that shaped modern societies might have remained localized, altering the trajectory of human development.
Technological advancements, critical thinking, and above all else Europeans and people of European descent have forever been far superior to everyone else around the world.
Europe's primary ruler at that time would've been the pope (Pope Clement VI).
The Defence of the Realm Act was never explicitly repealed, but it would be near to impossible to secure a conviction based on it, as subsequent legislation has effectively overturned most of its provisions. In the same way; blasphemy laws have never been repealed, and yet a court ruled a year or two ago that human rights legislation made it impossible to convict anyone of blasphemy.
Well, if the British wouldn't have come to rule over India, then everything would have been changed. Some activities like the abolishment of Sati, or the introduction of Widow Remarriage Act, or even the abolishment of Child Marriage wouldn't have happened. We wouldn't have been speaking English also, if this rule never took place. We would have also been THE richest country in the whole world.
Africa is a continent and has never been ruled by one leader. The countries in Africa often have different leaders.
pfff what u say?? Albania never have been ruled from other countries,Albania have always ruled in Balkan
No, since its formation, the United Kingdom has never been ruled over by a foreign ruler or empire. However the individual countries themselves have sometimes been ruled over, in times before the nation of the UK was formed. England was ruled over by the Normans and the Romans, previously, while Wales was annexed by England.
No, Northern Ireland is not and never has been ruled by France.
No king has ruled the continent of America. There have been kings, or the equivalent, of some countries in America.
There have been 44 presidents of the United States. I don't know the number for any other countries in any other part of the Americas. But the presidents never "ruled" alone. There's the legislative and judicial branches as well..
Thailand
Nepal has been independent country since more then 2000 years. did you know that It is an insult to Nepal's sovereignty.Nepal is one of those countries that has never been conquered or ruled by the outsiders and have survived the battles with British India and many times with Tibet(China).
From whom? There has never been anyone to claim independence from. Its constituent countries have sometimes been ruled by foreign nations - I suppose when the Romans left, 411 AD, England became independent from them.
There has never been a lasting peace. Countries inevitably find reasons for war.There has never been a lasting peace.
It was first called the New World because Europeans never been there
Why Not? All colonial countries sought independence, because of the influence of socialist teachers and ministers of the church from the European countries. Otherwise they would have been content to live in more peaceful conditions than they had ever had under despotic self rule.