answersLogoWhite

0

James Mill divided history according to the religion or view of the most dominant and powerful ruler in India at the time.

The problem with the periodization of James Mill is that he only looks at Indian history from the view point of the rulers, and doesn't think about the views of the people.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What was the problem with the periodisation of Indian history that James mill offers?

James Mill's periodization of Indian history was problematic because it oversimplified and misrepresented the complexities of India's diverse cultures and historical developments. He divided Indian history into three distinct periods—Hindu, Muslim, and British—without adequately acknowledging the rich interactions and continuities between these eras. This linear and Eurocentric perspective marginalized indigenous narratives and contributions, leading to a skewed understanding of India's past. Additionally, it reinforced colonial attitudes by portraying Indian society as stagnant and in need of Western intervention for progress.


What are the two archaeological sources in ancient Indian history?

the sources of modern history of India were the literary sources like manuscripts,scrolls , books ,important documents etc.;the second would be archaeological sources and monuments and the third would be other sources like printing machine,photographs,reports.radio broadcasts etc.


What has the author James Frederick Rees written?

James Frederick Rees has written: 'The problem of Wales and other essays' -- subject(s): History, Modern, Modern History 'Tudor policy in Wales' -- subject(s): Politics and government, History 'A short fiscal and financial history of England 1815-1918' -- subject(s): Finance, World War, 1914-1918, History


What does the periodisation done by James Mill represent about India?

James Mill's periodization of Indian history, particularly in his work "The History of British India," reflects a Eurocentric perspective that categorizes Indian civilization into distinct stages: ancient, medieval, and modern. This framework underscores Mill's belief in the superiority of Western civilization and implies a linear progression of societal development, positioning India as stagnant or regressive. His categorization often overlooks the complexities and continuities of Indian history, reducing it to a simplistic narrative that aligns with colonial ideologies. Ultimately, Mill's periodization reveals more about British attitudes toward colonial subjects than it does about the actual historical realities of India.


Who has the richest history in football history?

james newkirk


How did Wayne Rooney meet coleen?

"he noticed a problem with her bike. so he stopped her, helped to fix it and the rest is football history" according to James Corden on 'A League of their own'


What has the author James H Lanman written?

James H. Lanman has written: 'History of Michigan' -- subject(s): History


What has the author James Bingay written?

James Bingay has written: 'A history of Canada for high schools' -- subject(s): History


What has the author James Whary written?

James Whary has written: 'Sketches of Church history' -- subject(s): Church history


What has the author Robert James Noye written?

Robert James Noye has written: 'A dictionary of local history' -- subject(s): History 'Clare' -- subject(s): History


What has the author James R Hinds written?

James R. Hinds has written: 'Bulwark and Bastion' -- subject(s): Fortification, History, History, Military, Military History


History of King James?

hxsha