Most of the people the Europeans brought over to the New World as slaves were West Africans from the central an western part of Africa. This was known as the Atlantic slave trade.
There are 3 Answers! Be sure to get them all.AnswerAfricans were immune to the conditions and diseases. It was because the africans were already in contact with the europeans when they had started trading with one another. Europeans felt they could indur the climate because of their skin color. Many Native Americans started to die off because of the diseases. Alot of the native Americans also started to escape,fight back, and many of them died off. They also felt that Africans were cheaper. AnswerThe Native Americans were less resistant to the diseases that the Europeans brought over. The Portuguese and other sailors had already made the selling of African slaves an established trade. In North America, the settlers initially weren't in a position to take Native Americans as slaves because they lived a precarious existence that needed to be at peace with the Natives to continue. AnswerThere were more Africans available and the Europeans found it more pracitcal to buy Africans from Africans than to attempt to capture "Native Americans."
Although some people think it was all the Europeans fought that Africa was taken over but it was also the Africans. African leaders (mainly in West Africa), engaged in the slave trade and received some advantages. Some African kings traded their people for weapons.
At the time Europe was home to the most powerful and richest empires of the time: Austria-Hungary, Germany, Russia, France and Great Britain. Over the centuries, European countries had become master of all the major trade routes and of all major world trade, were masters of the richest Asian countries like Indonesia and India and had made themselves 'protectors' of most of Africa. Other advantages were that Europe - together with the US - was way ahead of the rest of the world in the field of technology and weaponry. And the ruthlessness with which European countries pursued their goals and set out their strategies usually had them several steps ahead of whoever they were dealing with at any point.
he was stupid and no one liked him. he made no technological or cultural advances. Basically, he took over france. The end.
Smallpox and Guns
cotton machines
A Well-defined infrastructure.
Well, honey, Europeans had a leg up on Africans with their fancy schmancy guns and ships. They also had the upper hand with their knowledge of metalworking and agricultural techniques. But hey, at the end of the day, it's not about who had the better toys, it's about how you use them.
Technology
guns
they evolved from other living organisms over the thousands of years, the same as Asians and Europeans.
Slavery expanded when Natives were forced to work for Europeans and Africans were shipped to the New World. This did not happen during the Middle Ages, however; it happened during the Renaissance.
One of the advantages of the fur trade for Indians was that the Europeans supplied them with rifles. Fur was in high demand in Europe so Europeans were making a lot of profit. A disadvantage of the fur trade for the Europeans was that they had a lot of conflict with each other. A disadvantage for the Indians was that the Europeans took control over the fur trade.
it was actualy both because they saw it has a new channel of comunication but ended up dislikeing it of the causes that the europeans took over and made them slaves.
The trianglar trade rout.
Marlow's first impression of the Europeans in the book "Heart of Darkness" was that they were arrogant, greedy, and exploitative. He saw them as imposing their will on the native Africans and using violence to maintain their power and control over the region.