Without leaders, the world would lack direction, coordination, and vision. Progress would slow, conflicts might escalate, and innovation could stall. Leaders whether in communities, governments, or organizations bring clarity in confusion, unite people toward shared goals, and turn challenges into opportunities. In their absence, decisions would be fragmented, efforts misaligned, and the drive to improve could fade. The world might still function, but not with the same purpose, pace, or possibility.
who were the leaders involved in WW1 who were the leaders involved in WW1
Ghandi
*were *their
I believe Edison had more of an influence on mankind then any other person.Without Edison we would still be burning wood for energy. Our world would be a smoke stack without enough trees to replace oxygen.blah blah blah
Palace of Versailles
No. It would be very different, though. It would be better if more world leaders were women, but the less diverse a group, the more likely it is to have problems.
The world would suck without skate boarding because without it what would be fun?
asians would run us and Deeptha would rise to power
who was china world leaders
A world without Buddhism.
the world will be like a body without soul
Without money the world would have been dominated by barter trade
The world would be round xD
One word to describe 'What this world would be without rules' would be chaotic.
i dont know what the answer is. i was trying to find out the answer too. me too i was trying to figure this out
Mass=energy so a world without energy is a world without mass. If you don't have energy you don't have a world.
how would the world be different with out pocahontas