0
What else can I help you with?
What was John Lockes contribution to European history?
John Locke was a famous philosopher who believed that humans, when born, had a clear mental state. He said that humans changed because of their surroundings. He believed that government was only there to protect human's right to life, liberty, and property. He believed that government was an agreement between the ruler and the ruled, and if the ruler failed on his part of the bargin, the people had the right and responsibility to get rid of the ruler. His beliefs are commonly contrasted to those of Thomas Hobbes, who believed practically the opposite. He believed that humans were vile creatures, who needed a government, because without one, people would be living in a constant state of warfare. He believed that government was a contract between the people and the ruler for protection, and that if the people didn't like the ruler they were stuck with him, none the less. Hope this helps!
Workers carried their requests for better working conditions to the czar's palace because?
They believed only he could help them.
Is it true that teen agers nowadays have no sense of history?
People, will only know what they have learnt. if this generation have no sense of history it is because the last generation failed to teach them it.
Will war destroy the world?
Possibly, it will. But war will only be the immediate or indirect cause of destruction. The true cause will be the ideologies, philosophies and religions that promote discord and violence as a means to some end.
What were the Effects of world war 2 on the political systems of who were involved in the war?
The effects of war are caused by violence and stupidity. but the war was only started because the politians were fighting. And i have no idea what i am talking about! Good Bye!!!!!!! yo
Who believed in use of violence only all else failed?
Sons Of Liberty
Who believed that only violence could end slavery?
john brown
Did Samuel Adams believe in the use of violence only then all else failed?
Samuel Adams was a strong advocate for American independence and believed in the necessity of resistance against British oppression. While he preferred peaceful protest and political action, he recognized that violence might be necessary when all other means had been exhausted. Adams understood the importance of rallying support for the revolutionary cause, and he saw armed resistance as a last resort to secure liberty and justice for the colonies. Ultimately, he believed that the struggle for freedom justified the use of force when faced with tyranny.
Was martin Luther king a good role model?
Martin Luther King (Jnr), originally Micheal Luther King (Jnr), didn't believe in violence and took it upon himself to end segregation in the USA. He succeeded. He believed that Violence, when used, only increased the violence. A quote from his speech shows this remarkably well; 'Violence only begets violence... Hate cannot end hate, only love can do that'
What was Malcolm little's opinion about violence?
Malcolm had a very strong opinion about violence. he believed that white people were devils and that they were only alive to make black people upset, afraid and wary. Also Malcolm was a Violant protester and believed that the black peoples of America would only gain equality through violent happenings.
Why Jose rizal much againts the idea of revolution?
Jose Rizal was against the idea of revolution because he believed in achieving reforms through peaceful means such as education and legal processes. He believed that violence would only lead to more suffering and bloodshed among the Filipino people. Rizal also feared the consequences of a failed revolution and the potential backlash from the colonial authorities.
Who wrote the quote violence only begets more violence?
The quote "violence only begets more violence" was spoken by Moses, it's in the bible.
Why is violence nessasary?
Violence should only be used on a teddy bear
WHAT FUSES Needs to be replaced in the chrysler 300?
Only the ones that have failed.Only the ones that have failed.
Is non - violence appropriate in these trouble times?
Of course it is. Violence only creates more violence and hatred. The only way to settle disagreements is compromise, talk and education.
How is violence self consuming?
it is self-consuming as whatever violence you commit, it will only backfire in the end. there is no point in violence.
If a husband is cheating can the person he is cheating with get into legal trouble?
Heck yea! That s.o.b. can et in trouble only if they are braking a restraining order, or something else like that. If violence or assualt is involved it can.
