Probably the best summary of the reasons is the list of grievances given in the Declaration of Independence. All of them are phrased in terms of what the King of England had done or failed to do although in many cases it was actually the English Parliament that was behind it:
Louis XIV rule time ended of old age.
Ivan the great
Tudor
In 1658, Shah Jahan was confined by his third son Aurangzeb. Thus Shah Jahan's rule came to an end. Aurangzeb ascended the throne in the same year. Shah Jahan lived in confinement for eight years until his death in 1666.
The end of capitalism, the end of royalty, everyone gets paid the same, everyone has the same equal opportunities, everyone lives in the same type of apartment building, everyone has the same education. The end of religion, (communists are atheists). Communists want the whole world to be communist. The end of different types of goods. One type of car, one style of clothing.
They wanted independence from England to become their own nation
Because the english didnt want the vikings to rule their country that the englishman sent them away and ENDED (Died or turned to skeleton)
Plugs and water will not rule the world, although they are nice to have when you want to take a bath.
No, there is no rule in English that a word must end with a vowel sound. Many words end in consonant sounds and this is perfectly acceptable in the language.
The American soldiers were mainly in the fight out of a sense of duty, honor, and adventure, and a desire to end the English blockades and avenge the deaths of their countrymen.
Since I am not personally a believer in the supposed divine right of kings, I do not see any basis for King George III to rule the American colonies against the wishes of the colonists. The colonists were basically in the right. Of course, their moral position was somewhat weakened by their continued practice of slavery, which was not to end until almost a century later. The colonists were no saints, either.
End of Roman rule in Britain ended in 410.
It has always been proper to end an English sentence with a preposition. The utterly false rule about not ending a sentence with a preposition comes from an ill-starred attempt to make English conform to the rules of Latin grammar, where a sentence may not end with a preposition. English is not Latin: we can end a sentence with a preposition IF WE WANT TO. Winston Churchill said that the Victorian grammarians' diktat that a sentence must not end with a preposition " . . . is a restriction up with which I will not put".
It'll never end, Nancy. Never.
The English army invades Scotland at the end of Macbeth to overthrow Macbeth's tyrannical rule. King Duncan's son, Malcolm, leads the English forces with the intention of restoring order and justice to Scotland.
The Patriots
Yes. Originally, the grammatical rule was to never end a sentence with a preposition. However, this has become obsolete in modern English usage.Another example, " Go on ! " meaning continue with your ......Yes. There is no rule against ending an English sentence with a preposition. That is a genteel error foisted on schoolchildren by educationists. It is Latin sentences that may not end with a preposition. Jamming English grammar into a Latin straitjacket is something no idiomatic speaker of English will put up with.