Because the ruling French and British political establishment were first and foremost worried with the Soviet threat - and at that time, fascism was considered by many conservatives the only feasible way to avoid a communist revolution. Therefore, it has been speculated that the (in)famous appeasement policy that those countries followed was targeted at creating a strong Germany that could face the Soviet Union. But, with the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of August 1939 (the No-Aggresion Pact between the Soviet Union and the German Reich), all hopes of playing both totalitarian powers against each other vanished.
It's just a theory, but it explains perfectly some Franco-British policies that at first sight may look illogical. An excellent essay by F. William Engdahl exploring the question at lenght is to be found here; if you are really interested in this topic it's a must-read:
http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/History/MacKinder/mackinder.html
No part of Canada is British. French are a majority in Quebec.
The feel good because they thought that French and British change everything in the Middle East
Robert Clive.
They were longtime enemies of the French.
They were longtime enemies of the French.
The native Indians, equipped and encouraged by the French fought the British settlers.
The French had claimed the Ohio River Valley first, so they are the ones who fought against the British.
One cause was Native Americans' anger at British policies after the French and Indian war.
Joan, herself, did not accomplish her goal of driving the British out of France but her example encouraged the French army to eventually do the job.
British success in the French and Indian War -Apex American History 1 The success of the British colonists in the French and Indian war (1754-1763) led to repressive policies against the Native Americans. This conflict presaged the later wars that drove the native tribes from lands sought by European settlers.
Washington encouraged a hands off policy regarding American involvement in European affairs.
They were hoping to spread the influence of Communism in fascist countries.
After the Treaty of Paris in 1763, British rule in New France was characterized by policies aimed at assimilating the French-speaking population and integrating the territory into the British Empire. The Royal Proclamation of 1763 established British governance and sought to limit westward expansion by reserving lands for Indigenous peoples. The Quebec Act of 1774 further allowed the French-speaking population to retain their language, religion (Catholicism), and civil law, while also expanding Quebec's territory, which aimed to stabilize the region and appease the French Canadians. These policies reflected a mix of assimilation efforts and concessions to maintain order and loyalty among the French population.
The revolutionaries in Latin America were encouraged by the French Revolution and the American Revolution.
Many American Indians began to desert the French in favor of the British during the French and Indian War (1754-1763), particularly after the British victories, such as the capture of Fort Duquesne in 1758. The British offered better trade terms and promised to respect native land rights, which appealed to many tribes. Additionally, the shifting power dynamics and the perception of a more stable British presence encouraged some tribes to ally with the British against their common French adversaries. As the war progressed, the changing fortunes of the conflict influenced these alliances significantly.
In England the agricultural revolution led to massive changes in the organisation and mechanisation of farming. The American revolution had significant consequences for the British Empire and encouraged the French people to believe that tyranny could be challenged. The French Revolution resulted in the abolition of the monarchy and the feudal system in France.
No, they are British.