Lamarck's theory is that an organism can pass traits to their offspring that they have acquired in their lifetime. One example commonly used is that he felt giraffes acquired long necks because of generations of them stretching and trying to reach higher leaves on the tree. He thought that these stretched muscles would be passed down to their offspring. This has been proven wrong because this is not how evolution takes place. If you would cut off the tails of two mice and then breed them their offspring would not have short tails.
Lamarck did. Neodarwinism theorises that species evolve when gene frequencies change, not individual organisms. Larmarkism is true for epigenetic inheritance, favourable and unfavourable characteristics alike.
Lamarck's theory of inheritance of acquired characteristics influenced Darwin by introducing the idea that organisms could change over time in response to their environment. Although Darwin ultimately rejected Lamarck's mechanisms, he was inspired by the concept of adaptation and the idea that species are not fixed. This led him to explore natural selection as a more robust explanation for how species evolve and adapt. Thus, while Darwin diverged from Lamarckism, he acknowledged its role in shaping his thoughts on evolution.
Jean- Baptiste Lamarck
Darwin and Lamarck had fundamentally different views on how species change over time. Lamarck proposed that organisms could acquire traits during their lifetime and pass those traits to their offspring, a process known as inheritance of acquired characteristics. In contrast, Darwin introduced the theory of natural selection, suggesting that species evolve through the differential survival and reproduction of individuals based on heritable traits that confer advantages in a given environment. This marked a significant shift toward understanding evolution as a gradual process driven by natural mechanisms rather than intentional adaptations.
Fossils or natural selection
Jean-Baptiste Lamarck
Lamarck's theory is based on acquired characteristics. In other words if you break your arm your future children will be born with broken arms.
Lamarck did. Neodarwinism theorises that species evolve when gene frequencies change, not individual organisms. Larmarkism is true for epigenetic inheritance, favourable and unfavourable characteristics alike.
That organisms pass on traits acquired in their lifetimes. It was rejected in favour of Darwinian evolution, in which species and not individuals evolve, but Larmarckism is valid to a point where epigenetics is concerned.
Jean- Baptiste Lamarck
Lamarck proposed that by selective use or disuse of organs, organisms acquired or lost certain traits during their lifetime. Then passed onto offspring-leading to change in species
That organisms pass on traits acquired in their lifetimes. It was rejected in favour of Darwinian evolution, in which species and not individuals evolve, but Larmarckism is valid to a point where epigenetics is concerned.
Fossils or natural selection
I think you evolve Happiny into Chansey with the oval stone? They have to hold it and level up I think?
One thing is that scientist think we will lose our pinkie toe
Jean-Baptiste Lamarck
Not well supported by the evidence and basically just assertion. Lamarck asserted that acquired characteristics, such as muscles developed during one's lifetime, were heritable. They are not. He also asserted that an organism had a " desire " to evolve. This was also not true.