Religious believers of creation say humans are made by God. Otherwise, neither; evolution does not teach that humans evolved from monkeys, but instead from ape-like creatures millions of years ago.
No, of course not. Evidence does not prove evolution - it validates the theory.Evidence which Darwin had included limited fossils, and observed apparent speciation in birds.
To explain the species problem, " that mystery of mysteries " which was the natural history problem of the day. From his observations and experiments Darwin proposed his theory of evolution by natural selection, which provided a mechanism for the observed fact of evolution.
On the Galapagos Islands, Charles Darwin observed unique species of birds, tortoises, finches, and marine iguanas. These observations contributed to the development of his theory of evolution by natural selection.
Evolution is the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms. By sequencing genes one can see this happen. Also just observing the morphological and behavioral changes in populations over time can lead to evidence supporting evolution. Check Lenski and his E. coli experiments. Over 20 years evolution was observed in these microorganisms. Fairly easy Google.
Evolution is routinely observed both in nature and in the lab. Even several speciation "events" are on record.
A:Evolution of species is the process by which each species developed from earlier species. Some people believe that, because it requires a great many generations and noticeable changes normally take place over periods far longer than the human lifetime, evolution can not be observed directly and can only be imputed indirectly from fossil finds and DNA evidence. However, bacteria have extremely short lifespans and evolution can indeed be observed in them. The evidence of evolution is clearly seen in numerous fossils and in DNA. Even if not observed in real time, this evidence is regarded as conclusive.
None have been directly observed. Our ability to analyse in detail the structures of the human anatomy is fairly new. In the short time since we've been able to map neural structures and neurochemical patterns, no significant evolution can be expected to have occurred.
The theory predicts that evolution will happen and in certain ways. The observed evolution makes this prediction correct. It also defines evolution as happening, and as such is perfect evidence in support of it.
If it could be directly observed then it would not be called dark matter!
The development of humans was directly dependent on factors such as evolution, adaptation to changing environments, use of tools, development of social structures, and increased brain size and cognitive abilities. These factors contributed to our survival and success as a species.
Changes in the frequency of genetic variants, such as lactose tolerance in certain populations, can be observed within a human lifespan. Microevolutionary changes in bacteria and viruses, like antibiotic resistance, can also be observed relatively quickly. Additionally, human-induced environmental changes can drive rapid evolution in species, such as urban-dwelling animals adapting to city environments.
No, Higgs Boson is a theoretical particle yet to be observed directly or indirectly by humans. Quarks on the other hand have been observed directly and indirectly. Also, the Higgs boson is responsible for a field, however quarks are responsible for matter, and are the basic constituents of the nuclei in atoms.
Yes, evolution has been observed in numerous studies and experiments. Examples include the development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria, changes in beak size of Galapagos finches, and the coloration of peppered moths in response to environmental changes.
Bacteria
Evolution.
Evolution, the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms, is an observed and observable fact. That's why.