answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

"Sally Jones thinks that tax cuts are the answer. But then again, Sally Jones couldn't find her way out of a paper bag if it was already ripped open.".

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: An example of the logical fallacy called attack ad hominem?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is a fallacy in which a claim or argument is rejected the basis of some unrelated fact about the person presenting the argument?

Attack and Hominem


What is a fallacy in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some unrelated fact about the person presenting the argument?

This type of fallacy is called an ad hominem fallacy or ad hominem attack. The Latin term means "to the man" i.e. attacking the speaker rather than refuting the argument. It may also be referred to as an irrelevance.


Which logical fallacy is used in this passage?

Ad Hominem Attack APEX


Is a fallacy in which a claim or argument is rejected?

A fallacy where a claim or argument is dismissed because of the person making it, rather than the evidence or logic presented. It focuses on attacking the person's character or traits instead of addressing the argument itself.


What is an ad-hominum attack?

An ad hominem is a type of logical fallacy that refers to a personal attack directed at the character of another person rather than the specifics of their argument.An ad hominem is used in an attempt to discredit the premise of an opponent's argument by insulting or belittling them. The fallacy being that the merits of an opponent's argument are not necessarily connected to their personal character.e.g.John says, "Smoking is harmful to your health."Sue says, "What do you know John? You're an idiot and you smoke too, so keep your opinion to yourself!"Regardless if John is a smoker or an "idiot", neither criticism invalidates his argument. A thoughtful rebuttal to John would have to address what he said without attacking him.e.g.Provide evidence or reasoning that smoking is not harmful to ones' health.Note: The above example also contains the logical fallacy: "Tu quoque."Tu quoque is an attempt to invalidate an opponent's argument by pointing out that they engage in the same behaviour that they are criticizing (hypocrisy).


What is a fallacy in which a claim or argument attacks the person rather than the reasoning?

This is referred to as an ad hominem attack (Latin to the man), attempting to invalidate the argument by making charges against the person making the argument.


Which fallacy is this example When did you stop hiring other people to take your exams for you?

Ad hominem argument - usually involves insulting or belittling one's opponent in order to attack his claim or invalidate his argument, but can also involve pointing out true character flaws or actions that are irrelevant to the opponent's argument.Example - Candidate Jane's proposal about zoning is ridiculous. She was caught cheating on her taxes in 2003.


What logical fallacy is shown in the comment made to a Judge in a courtroom Your Honor the other lawyer's case may be good but it doesn't matter since he's clearly an incompetent idiot?

This describes ad hominem. Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a logical fallacy. In this argument, rubbuttal attacks the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the issues or argument.Ad hominem fallacies often arise or show up when a person feels strongly about a topic, and is led by emotion rather than logic. Passion topics often include politics, religion, law, and even minor disagreements.Example of a current often-heard topic that disintegrates into arguing personalities and attacking:Person 1: I won't vote for Donald Trump because of his beliefs about immigration. The United States was built by immigrants, for immigrants. US history from 1800s to 1960s shows biases against many groups, such as against Russians, Italians, Slavs, Poles, and even the Irish. Now, the same biases have shifted to those of the Muslim faith, and Mexicans.Person 2: WAKE UP--What's wrong with you! They are taking our jobs, living free off the government, taking our housing, and they are violent drug-using, gun-toting criminals!Person 1: Those are the SAME arguments that were used against Russians, Italians, Slavs, Poles, and even the Irish. And, please, don't attack me... discuss the issues.Person 2: What are you?? A Muslim-lover? Or maybe you are one of those Mexicans! Go home--we don't want you here! (The person has switched totally to an ad hominem logical fallacy.)


What is the origin of the term 'ad hominem'?

The term 'ad hominem' comes from Latin and means "to the person." It refers to an argument that attacks a person's character or traits rather than addressing the actual issue being discussed. The use of ad hominem arguments is considered a logical fallacy in debate.


Enlist and explain at least five logical fallacies most commonly encountered in everyday communication?

Ad Hominem: Attack on the person making an argument rather than addressing the argument itself. Appeal to Authority: Using the opinion of an authority figure as evidence in an argument without further support. Bandwagon Fallacy: Arguing that a claim is true because many people believe it. False Cause: Incorrectly assuming that one event caused another without proper evidence. Strawman: Misrepresenting someone's argument to make it easier to attack.


Does John Swift use any ethical fallacies in A Modest Proposal?

There is at least one logical fallacy in A Modest Proposal. Swift refers to his American friend throughout as the guy he got all his information on eating babies from. It infers that Americans eat babies. The fallacy is that because he is considered an expert, when he says something readers must think its true, which it isn't. Satire is a form of writing that employs wit to attack folly, Swift uses his entire essay as a witty attack on the social and economical problems of the time in Ireland.


What type of fallacy is allowing a boxer to attack another man with his fists is like giving him a gun and permission to shoot and kill?

Faulty analogy.