No. Evolution is the change in allele ( different molecular forms of the same gene ) frequency over time in a population of organisms. No equilibrium there.
True
A method that mimics evolution and natural selection to solve the problem.
It changes genes and so passes them on
Genetic variation, which can lead to evoloution, and then potentially a new species.
my notes from my class say maladaptive....
Allele frequency is altered by genetic drift, natural selection, migration, mutation, or nonrandom mating. This results in a change in genetic equilibrium in a population that is evolving. Evolution leads eventually to speciation.
Changes in genetic equilibrium can lead to speciation over longer periods of time, typically spanning thousands to millions of years. Rapid bursts of speciation, known as adaptive radiations, can occur in certain circumstances such as when a population undergoes rapid environmental changes, leading to the rise of multiple new species in a relatively short time span.
Migration affects the genetic equilibrium of a population by maintaining it.
All species have the same genetic code.
Evolution is not a cause of genetic change: it is the effect of genetic change.
Not biological evolution in the standard sense. No variation, genetic variability, and there is nothing for natural selection to select from.
Micro-evolution is not only a part of macro-evolution, it is the same mechanism as macro-evolution. Macro-evolution includes speciation, as a result of continuing micro-evolution.
That situation is called a Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Not actually seen outside of the lab.
Punctuated equilibrium.
The unifying themes of botany are: Evolution, ecology, genetic continuity and reproduction, growth, development and differentiation, force matter and organization, maintenance and dynamic equilibrium
genetic drift
It is true.