It can go both ways. Many people have been helped due to advances in genetic knowledge, which has allowed us to further our treatment for many medical conditions.
Billions of people's lives have been saved or helped due to vaccinations, which have pretty much wiped out diseases like polio and mmr. Without advances in genetic knowledge, developing and improving these medicines would be impossible.
However, there are risks to genetic experimentation. Since it's not perfect, there are possible side-affects and things that could go wrong, which is why medicines are extensively tested before available to the public.
There is also controversy in stem cell research. Many believe that this is morally wrong for the baby, but so far scientists have found no major side-affects or harm to the baby from this type of research.
Scientists already do experiment on humans, such as in medication studies. Every study falls under Human Research Review standards and regulations and each participant must sign an informed release.
YES! As long as the human is willing to be experimented on.
Human experimentation is more of your own opinion. It could be good because it can help find cures, or it can be bad and the things they are using on them could be fatal.
yes but it against the law and unlike books or movies the genetic mutations they make never last they all fail and will continue to fail
They might just want to retest ,but there are other reasons not everyone could be sure of that.
the answer is the scientist designs a scientific inquiry
The scientific theory should be changed.
Analyze the experiment to decide whether the results were flawed.
The tools that a scientist would use to conduct an experiment would vary greatly on the nature of the experiment.
they do not want to be spotted and be known because humans will try to kill it. And scientist will experiment them
you might not get the experiment correct (:
They might just want to retest ,but there are other reasons not everyone could be sure of that.
the reason why a rejected hypothesis can still be of value to a scientist is because that secific hyothesis may not work for your experiment but it could work for a different experiment/theory
The Scientist gave a very strong Hypothesis on his experiment
a scientist can do another experiment or change their hypothesis.
the answer is the scientist designs a scientific inquiry
The scientific theory should be changed.
Analyze the experiment to decide whether the results were flawed.
Many times, the scientist has a fair amount of confidence that the experiment will perform according to the prediction.
The tools that a scientist would use to conduct an experiment would vary greatly on the nature of the experiment.
Kill the dog,take out the eyes and give a scientist to test it.