answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

It can go both ways. Many people have been helped due to advances in genetic knowledge, which has allowed us to further our treatment for many medical conditions.

Billions of people's lives have been saved or helped due to vaccinations, which have pretty much wiped out diseases like polio and mmr. Without advances in genetic knowledge, developing and improving these medicines would be impossible.

However, there are risks to genetic experimentation. Since it's not perfect, there are possible side-affects and things that could go wrong, which is why medicines are extensively tested before available to the public.

There is also controversy in stem cell research. Many believe that this is morally wrong for the baby, but so far scientists have found no major side-affects or harm to the baby from this type of research.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Scientists already do experiment on humans, such as in medication studies. Every study falls under Human Research Review standards and regulations and each participant must sign an informed release.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

YES! As long as the human is willing to be experimented on.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Human experimentation is more of your own opinion. It could be good because it can help find cures, or it can be bad and the things they are using on them could be fatal.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

yes but it against the law and unlike books or movies the genetic mutations they make never last they all fail and will continue to fail

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Could scientist experiment on humans
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why do the yeti walk in the mountins?

they do not want to be spotted and be known because humans will try to kill it. And scientist will experiment them


What could happen if a scientist does not conduct a controlled variable?

you might not get the experiment correct (:


Why do scientist replicate other scientist experiment?

They might just want to retest ,but there are other reasons not everyone could be sure of that.


How can a rejected hypothesis be of value to a scientist?

the reason why a rejected hypothesis can still be of value to a scientist is because that secific hyothesis may not work for your experiment but it could work for a different experiment/theory


Could you provide a sentence for Hypothesis?

The Scientist gave a very strong Hypothesis on his experiment


What options does a scientist have if experiment does not support hypothesis?

a scientist can do another experiment or change their hypothesis.


After the scientist makes a hypothesis they perform a to collect data?

the answer is the scientist designs a scientific inquiry


A scientist performs an experiment The results of the experiment disagree with a scientific theory The scientist repeats the experiment several times and gets the same results The scientist then?

The scientific theory should be changed.


A scientist does an experiment The results of the experiment disagree with a major scientific theory What should the scientist do?

Analyze the experiment to decide whether the results were flawed.


Is it true that scientist who performs an experiment has no idea what the outcome of the experiment is going to be?

Many times, the scientist has a fair amount of confidence that the experiment will perform according to the prediction.


What do scientist use to do their experiments?

The tools that a scientist would use to conduct an experiment would vary greatly on the nature of the experiment.


What is an experiment that you could do to find out if dogs can see colors?

Kill the dog,take out the eyes and give a scientist to test it.