Did The Missouri Compromise include missouri?

already exists.

Would you like to merge this question into it?

already exists as an alternate of this question.

Would you like to make it the primary and merge this question into it?

exists and is an alternate of .

Yes, is included Missouri, it was the balance between Missouri and Maine so there would be a free state (Maine) and a slave state. (Missouri)
6 people found this useful

What was the Missouri Compromise?

The Missouri Compromise was an agreement between the North and theSouth and passed by Congress in 1820 that allowed Missouri to beadmitted as the 24th state in 1821. One slave state (Missouri) andone free state (Maine) were admitted to the Union, maintaining thebalance. The balance of power between free and slave states inCongress was maintained to ease tensions between the North andSouth. The North's attempt to force emancipation upon Missouri when itapplied for admission as a slave state in 1819 rankled whitesoutherners, and they threatened secession during the debates overthe conditions under which Missouri should be granted statehood.The debates resulted in a compromise that involved the drawing of aline through the United States prohibiting slavery in future statesnorth of the latitude 36°30′ and allowing it in future states southof that. (Missouri itself, despite lying almost entirely north ofthe line, was admitted as a slave state.) This worked for about 34 years. The Missouri Compromise was a compromise of new territory should beconsidered a free state or slave state. This compromise proposedwhatever was north of the 36'30' line was to be a free state andwhatever was south of this line was to be slave state.

What was the whole compromise of the Compromise of Missouri in 1820?

\n. \n Answer \n. \nThe Missouri Compromise was an attempt to maintain the balance of power between the North and South when Missouri petitioned for statehood. The Compromise allowed Missouri, a slave state, and Maine, a free state, in together thereby maintaining equality between the two sides. However, the Compromise went on to prohibit slavery in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase that was north of latitude 36-30N. The Missouri Compromise that was passed in 1820 was between the proslavery and anti slavery factions in the United States Congress.

The Missouri Compromise did what?

Drew a line in the sand - everywhere North of that parallel (Missouri's Southern border) to be free soil. It kept the peace for thirty years, until the admission of California as one big state could not meet the terms of the Compromise.

Why was the Missouri Compromise a compromise?

The Missouri Compromise was a compromise because it worked out an argument. There were 11 free states and 11 slave states. Then Missouri came in and made it 12 slave states and 11 free states. They had to either go no slaves, slaves allowed, or some free some slave. They then addes another state to balance out the disagreement.

Where was the Missouri Compromise written?

The Missouri Compromise was passed in 1820 between the pro-slaveryand anti-slavery factions in the United States Congress. Itinvolved the regulation of slavery in the western territories.

How was the compromise of 1850 different from The Missouri Compromise?

The Missouri Compromise (1820) established that for each slave state that joined the US, another "free" (non-slave) state had to join, maintaining the balance between the two ideological positions. The South felt that it needed slaves to stay economically strong. The Compromise of 1850 (five separate bills in 1850) did away with the concept of balance and established that slavery would be decided internally in Kansas and Nebraska. The South was compensated by the Fugitive Slave Law. The acts also established territories in Utah and New Mexico, and allowed California into the US as a "free" state. Both Compromises were effectively repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1954, which allowed all states to decide on slavery on their own, creating the anti-slavery Republican Party and setting the stage for the US Civil War.

Who was the author of the Missouri Compromise?

Speaker of the House of Representatives, Henry Clay, who came fromthe boarder state of Kentucky, mediated between the North and theSouth, concerning the territory of Missouri becoming a state. From the Missouri Compromise, that became law in March of 1820: Missouri became a slave state, and Maine would enter as a freestate. In addition, the territory that remained from the LouisianaPurchase was divided in two along the line 36 degrees 30 minuteslatitude. With the exception of Missouri, slavery was prohibited in statesnorth of that line.

Why was The Missouri Compromise proposed?

it was proposed because Missouri wanted to enter the Union as a slave state, which would ruin their balance. So it was decided that they would let Missouri in so long as another (free) state, Maine, could enter at the same time, keeping the balance and an imaginary line would go across the country to show where slave states would be and where free states would be.

What did the the Missouri Compromise do?

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was a compromise between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in Congress agreeing to prohibit slavery in states north of the parallel 36°30' north except in the state of Missouri. Additionally, the state of Maine was allowed to join the Union as a free state. This compromise was passed due to concerns of the creation of the state of Missouri destroying the delicate balance between slave states and free states in Congress.

What were the compromises made in the Missouri compromise?

All Missouri Territory north of the parallel 36°30' north excluded slavery with the exception of the portion that was the proposed state of Missouri. It also allowed the Arkansas Territory to have slavery. It allowed for the the admission of Maine into the Union as a free state.

What did the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850 do?

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 admitted Missouri as a slave state,and Maine as a free state, to keep the balance of slave/non-slavestates equal in Congress. It also established the 36-30 line, andsaid that slavery would not be allowed above that line except forin Missouri. The Compromise of 1850 admitted California as a free state, andgave the South stricter Fugitive Slave Laws as a way to "balance"the deal. It also gave Kansas and Nebraska territories the right todecide for themselves whether to allow slavery or not. Thisindirectly repealed the Missouri Compromise. To be more specific, the Kansas Nebraska Act of 1854 effectivelynegated the 1850 Missouri Compromise. Later the US Supreme Courtruled this Act was unconstitutional. The Civil War finalized the"slavery " question. And, the 13th Amendment abolished slavery.

Missouri Compromise did what?

Drew a line in the sand. Anywhere North of that line, slavery would be illegal. This kept the situation balanced, and kept the peace for thirty years. Unfortunately, the rule only applied to the territories acquired under the Louisiana Purchase. For the vast new lands brought in after the Mexican war, there had to be a new compromise. This one did not last.

Was the compromise of 1850 called the Missouri Compromise?

No. The Missouri Compromise was in 1820 after Missouri entered the union as as slave state. To keep the Senate balanced, Maine was admitted as a free state. The final agreement stated that no slave states could enter the Union above the southern border of Missouri, which is mostly 36° 30' degrees N latitude.

What was Missouri compromise and compromise of 1850?

The Missouri compromise had something to do with allowing Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state and everything south of the Louisiana purchase was slave states and north of the Missouri compromise line which was 30 degrees 30 minuets was free states except for Missouri itself. The compromise of 1850 had 5 parts . That California enter the union as a free state . Upholds popular sovereignty in New Mexico and Utah . Settles border dispute between Texas and New Mexico . Passes Fugitive slave act = fugitive slave LAW . and bans slave trade in Washington D.C the nations capitol

Why they approved The Missouri Compromise?

It looked like a neat-and-tidy solution - a straightforward dividing line, with slavery banned anywhere North of it. But abolitionism was a growing force in Congress, and any plans for extension of slavery met with furious opposition.

The compromise of 1850 restored the missoury compromise?

No. It replaced it with a deal - California to be admitted as a free state, with certain concessions to appease the South, including tightening-up the Fugitive Slave Act. It was the last-minute Crittenden Compromise that was meant to restore the Missouri Line, but Lincoln rejected this compromise, because it would have allowed some extension of slavery.

Who was the winner of the Missouri Compromise?

There was no winner. It was meant to be the 'level playing field', with slavery South of the line, and free soil North of it, so that the North would not be able to dominate Congress and pass laws unfavourable to the South.

What is the major reason for the Missouri Compromise?

To achieve some sort of balance between slave-states and free soil in the admission of new territories into the USA. The Southern border of Missouri was taken as the parallel - anywhere North of that line, slavery was illegal. This worked reasonably well, until the Mexican war, when vast new territories like California made it unworkable.

How was the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional?

It was only unconstitutional if you accepted Roger Taney's interpretation of the Constitution in his judgment of the Dred Scott case in 1857. He said the Constitution protected slavery - so therefore no state could declare itself to be free soil.

What were the specifics of The Missouri Compromise?

As new states were admitted to the Union, no slavery would be allowed anywhere North of the parallel that marked Missouri's Southern border. This worked reasonably well, but broke down when California was up for admission, since it extended so far North and South of that line that both sides claimed it, and a new compromise had to be worked out.

How did the Missouri Compromise of 1820 reach its compromise?

How the Missouri Compromise of 1820 reached its compromise is that they realized that Main was neither of the two .It wasn't a slave state nor was it a free state so they decided that Maine should be a free state because of its environment with all the factories and that Missouri should be a slave state because of its large plantations..

What was the compromise in The Missouri Compromise?

This was meant to settle the question of slavery in the Western territories that were applying to become states of the Union. It was agreed to draw one line of latitude, North of which slavery would be illegal. The line was the Southern border of Missouri. The Compromise worked well enough for thirty years, until after the Mexican war, when the future of California was being debated. The new state would extend so far either side of the Missouri line that both sides claimed it. So the Compromise broke down, and had to be replaced by another which did not last. It has often been commented that if there could have been two states, Northern California and Southern California, meeting on the Missouri line, the Civil War could have been avoided.

When was the Missouri Compromise created?

The Missouri Compromise was created on March 19, 1820. It was an attempt to retain the balance of power between the northern and southern states. It was repealed by the Kansas Nebraska Act.

What did the Missouri Compromise give up?

The Missouri Compromise provided that no Slave State could be established to the north of a line represented by the parallel 36° 30' coincident with the Southern boundary of Missouri.

What was the results of the Missouri Compromise?

Resulting from the Missouri was a division of territory west of that state being divided north and south between possible slave and free states. Also, to keep a balance of slave and free states in Congress, Maine was admitted as a free state at the same time Missouri became a slave state.

Compare the Missouri compromise and the compromise of 1850?

They were both concerned with the acquisition by America of vast new territories, and the debate over which of the forthcoming states would be slave and which would be free.. In the case of the land acquired from France by the Louisiana Purchase, they settled on the Southern border of Missouri as the divide. This parallel, as it extended westwards, would be the line, North of which slavery was illegal. This was the Missouri Compromise (1820), a simple arrangement that kept the peace for thirty years. After the Mexican war, the new state of California extended too far on either side of the Missouri line to fit the terms of the Missouri Compromise. So a new deal had to be worked out (Compromise of 1850), with California admitted to the union as free soil, subject to certain concessions to the South, including the Fugitive Slave Act. This roused furious reactions in the powerful Abolitionist lobby, and the new compromise did not last.

Did The Missouri Compromise scceed or fail?

It kept the peace for thirty years, and could have continued for longer, except that California was too big to fit the terms of the Compromise. (It extended too far on either side of the Missouri line.)

What happened to the Missouri compromise after 1854?

After 1854, the Missouri Compromise, which was the attempt tobalance the number of free states and slave states between theNorthern and Southern states of the United States, was relinquishedand replaced by the Kansas-Nebraska Act.

Did Missouri do The Missouri Compromise?

The Missouri Compromise was put forth by Senator Henry Clay in an attempt to prevent the addition of the new territory of Missouri, as a slave slate, from tipping the balance of power in Congress to Southern States. Since Missouri was not an official state until this compromise's passing, the state's people had no representation in Congress or ability to affect this bill.