NO
No,but the colonist had to pay for the tea they dumped
the boston tea party..........
No, they didn't.
Britain passed the Intolerable Acts, which heavily restricted Massachusetts's self governing abilities after the Boston Tea Party. There was no financial transaction that took place to pay back the tea.
the Boston tea party
No, the Intolerable Acts was a result of the Boston Tea Party. The Tea Act led to the Boston Tea Party
a group of people who didn't want to pay taxes on tea so they had a outraged that they had to pay taxes on just tea
a group of people who didn't want to pay taxes on tea so they had a outraged that they had to pay taxes on just tea
punished Boston for the tea party
342 cartons of tea were dumped during the Boston tea party.
The Boston Tea Party was when a bunch of colonial people dumped a load of British tea into the harbor because they didn't want to pay taxes...
The Boston Tea Party was actually not a war. Here is what it was, and what happened. The Tea Act passed. The colonists did not want to pay taxes. So, here is where the Boston Tea Party kicks in, one year after the Tea Act. Here is what you've been waiting for! The Boston Tea Party was an event that was three boats full of colonists. They cut open chests of tea and they dumped it in the Boston Harbor (harr-berr)! The colonists had to pay it off. So, the colonists named that law the Intolerable(in-toll-err-a-bowl) Act. So, the Boston Tea Party was not a war, but it was an event that the colonists responded to the Tea Act.