Scientific observation is the collection of scientific evidence. It is the act of noting certain aspects of something through scientific study. So one might, for example, observe that the Sun appears to travel across the sky.
Inference is the act of taking some known evidence and then reasoning a further fact from it. Inference can be based on evidence collected through observation or it can be based on pure reason alone. So, for example, we might infer from our observation that the Sun appears to travel across the sky that this means the Earth is rotating on its axis. An inference is not necessarily correct (it is in this example of course).
observation is observation! :)inference is inference! :)Assuming you meant "Differentiate observation from inference ?" !....Observation is the act of being able to physically see an object - inference is implying something is real without physical proof of its existence.Incidentally - why was this put into the category 'animal life' !
state why an observation cannot be an inference
state why an observation cannot be an inference
I think An observation about that inference is about that object.
observation is when you observe some thing inference is what you learn from your observation
inference
Inference is a logical interpretation. Observation is using your senses.
Inference is a logical interpretation. Observation is using your senses.
no
A observation
An observation is something that can be seen with your own eyes, and an inference is something based on face. Therefore, an inference does not come before an observation, but rather after.
It is an inference