No- I have not seen any evidence that he discriminates against anyone including his own race.
fair employment practices committee
Yes, Massachusetts outlaws discrimination in credit, public accommodation, housing, public and private employment and in union practices. Also, the MA Commission Against Discrimination has ruled that transgender individuals may pursue discrimination claims under the category of sex or disability discrimination. Same-sex couples are permitted to marry in Massachusetts.
Anti-semitism is discrimination against Jews.
Discrimination in any form is discrimination. Individual discrimination is discrimination of one person against a group. Institutional discrimination would be a institution totally and wholly discriminating against a group or sect.
Discriminatory procurement practices against foreign firms usually happen more often on a state level than on the federal level. Any business that people think will hurt U.S. products or services will face discrimination.
Unequal distribution of income, discrimination against non-traditional genders, access to water, fair labor practices, religious reformation......
Religion doesn't automatically imply discrimination, though religion has been used as a reason for discrimination AND for fighting against discrimination. It all depends on the actual person, not all religious people are 'for discrimination', and not all non-religious people are against discrimination.
Campaign Against Racial Discrimination was created in 1964.
The Campaign Against Racial Discrimination, also known as CARD, formally ended in 1968 after achieving its goal of establishing laws against racial discrimination in the UK. The organization played a key role in influencing the passing of the Race Relations Act of 1965 and the subsequent Race Relations Act of 1968.
No. Discrimination is NEVER justified.
Its goal was to end racial discrimination in the armed services. It accomplished its goal. On July 26, 1948, president Harry S. Truman signed an executive order that ended racial discrimination in the military.
Yes. But the suit would be for discrimination against the tenant who is handicapped, not for discrimination against the handicap. The justification for most suits for discrimination against people with handicaps is the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which is explained at http://www.jan.wvu.edu/links/adalinks.htm