Does science contradict evolution

Answer 1

Darwin said that in the future fossil records would either prove or disprove his theory, and the giants gaps in the records are to quick. Even if a group of fossilized species it doesn't show a slow progression of a creature changing as Evolution states, it shows quick sudden changes.-

Answer 2

No. Evolution is science. And it is entirely consistent with other sciences such as geology, Paleontology, paleoanthropology, physics and Biology.
Since evolution was first put forward in the early nineteenth century, scientists have reviewed the evidence and looked for alternative hypotheses, without success. Even a Creation scientist such as Michael J Behe says that he accepts the great age of the earth and that evolution really did occur, although he asks that Intelligent Design be considered as a plausible explanation for evolution. He says that design is hard to prove.
A scientific theory, in order to be accepted by scientists, must fits the facts as we know them and be capable of predicting results not yet known. There should not be another, conflicting theory that better fits the known facts. The Theory of Evolution meets these requirements - it fits the facts as we know them, subsequent research results are consistent with the Theory of Evolution, and there is no other theory that better fits the facts known to science.
For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation

Answer 3

According to the majority of scientists in the Western world, the answer is No. According to Creationists and many religious people, the answer is that random Evolution is either unproven or directly contradicted by the evidence.