answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Monroe stated: "The American continents ... are henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers" and warned the imperial European powers against interfering in the affairs of the newly independent Latin American states or potential United States territories. Any interference would b taken as a threat to America's security. This doctrine also refrain US from participation in European wars and pledged not to disturb existing colonies in the Western Hemisphere. It was successful in keeping France, Spain and other powers out of the region and allowed Britain to long remain the dominant trade power in Latin America.

No it does not state the US would not intervene. On the contrary, it basically lays the groundwork for the America's being in the US sphere of influence. While this does not mean the US would interfere in other country's affairs, it laid the ground work for future amendments to allow it. it also stated that Americans should not interfere in European nations affairs

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Does the Monroe Doctrine state that the US would not intervene in the affairs of countries in Latin America?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What did the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine state?

The United States reserved the right to intervene in the affairs of Central America and Caribbean


What was the Roosevelt Corollary?

The Roosevelt Corollary was an addition to the Monroe Doctrine. It stated that no European countries were allowed to intervene in Latin American affairs. The only way that the U.S was allowed to become involved was if the affairs or European countries was threatened. The United States could exercise police power in Latin America. The United States was the only country allowed to interfere with Latin American countries.


How did the Monroe Doctrine contribute to a greater sense of independence and nationhood?

The Americans were willing to intervene with European affairs by affirming their power. This raises lots of nationalism because it shows European countries that America is a respected nation that wasn't to be played with.


What was the effect on America of the Vietnam war?

Americans were less willing to intervene in the affairs of the other countries and had less trust in their leaders


Was the criticism of the Truman Doctrine?

Truman Doctrine: America should interfere to prevent communism. It's obvious: should America, or should they not, interfere with other countries' affairs?


Did the U.S. intervene in the affairs of Latin America?

{| |- | The US was heavily involved in South America. The Monroe Doctrine was the policy used to justify that involvement. South America was in our backyard and we didn't want hostile elements and instability to control the events there. |}


What gave America the right to intervene in Cuban affairs?

The Platt Amendment


What is the name of the theory that the US will be the only nation to intervene in Latin America?

Theodore Roosevelt's Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine held that the United States had a right to intervene in Latin American affairs. It considered the United States a police power of sorts, and saw Latin America as a way to expand America's economic interests.


What advances did Mexico made under General Diaz?

The Monroe Doctrine stated that Europe can no longer colonize or interfere with the newly independent countries. It also stated that the United States can interfere with any existing colonies in the Western Hemisphere. The goal of the Doctrine was to protect Latin America from European influence and control. The Doctrine was supported by the English because it kept Spain out of power. Today, the Doctrine is seen differently by leaders in Latin America because the US has used the Doctrine as a way to intervene is Latin American affairs.


How did the US use monroe doctrine and roosevelt corollary to influence latin American affairs?

Asserted the right of the United States to intervene to stabilize the economic affairs of small nations in the Caribbean and Central America if they were unable to pay their international debts.


America can intervene in the internal affairs of Latin America to maintain stability?

As much as Brazil or Mexico could intervene to change the US Government if its policies don't fit their schemes (i.e: a resounding NO).


What are the differences between the Roosevelt corollary and the Monroe doctrine?

Monroe Doctrine warns Europe not to invade the American continents, not american colonies, while the Roosevelt Corollary warns Europe not to invade countries south of the U.S. in the Western Hemisphere.