What would you like to do?
The 7-2 decision in Roe v. Wade, 410 US 13 (1973) challenged a Texas anti-abortion law, and overturned statutes that prohibited abortion in 46 states (the procedure was legal in four). The ruling was based on the right to privacy, which was extrapolated from language in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The "privacy" precedent was set earlier in Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 US 479 (1965), which nullified laws restricting married couples' right to be counseled about the use of contraceptives.
9 people found this useful
Was this answer useful?
Thanks for the feedback!
In 1973, the Supreme Court ruled in Roe v. Wade that women do have the right to choose an abortion during the first three months of pregnancy.
There has been an enormous amount of debate over whether Roe V. Wade was a correct ruling by the Supreme Court, however the question asks about the arguments used and this can… be objectively answered. Contrary to popular belief, it was NOT a ruling that the Federal Government should have jurisdiction over abortion, but rather one that said that ANY branch of government would be in violation of the 4th amendment by banning abortion. Although abortion is far too complex an issue for resolving here, the general argument carried in the Roe v. Wade decision was that attempts by any level of government to restrict access to abortion violated a person's 4th Amendment rights by interfering in the private relationship between a patient and a doctor. Even if the argument is accepted that the States have jurisdiction over the matter, the States are still bound by the 4th amendment, and therefore would be prohibited from restricting abortion based upon this ruling. Users are cautioned that this is not an appropriate forum for debating the morality of the issue, nor the "rightness" of the ruling. Such content will be removed and will simply result in a reversion and lock.
Norman McCorvey (Jane Roe)
The decision was that a women has the right to an abortion if her life is in jeopardy. Later, the Supreme Court would increase that too she can get an abortion any time before… the middle of the second trimester.
Jane Roe, whose real name is Norma McCorvey, had three children. The first, by her husband Woody McCorvey, was allegedly kidnapped, then later adopted, by Norma's mother when …Norma confessed her sexual orientation was either bi- or lesbian. She got pregnant with a second child sometime in 1965. The child was adopted by the baby's father under the condition that McCorvey never attempt contact. The Roe baby at the center of the abortion case was conceived in 1969. McCorvey, who was homeless and living on the street during her pregnancy, wanted to get an abortion, but was prevented from doing so by Texas law. She gave birth to the Roe baby in June 1970, and gave her up for private adoption. McCorvey claims she lent her name to the case because her circumstances fit a profile the pro-choice lawyers felt was compelling. She claims they approached her about challenging the Texas anti-abortion laws; she didn't contact them. McCorvey said she really had nothing to do with the case: never testified, never appeared in court, and only learned of the Supreme Court ruling sometime after-the-fact. McCorvey's situation was used to create a pro-choice test case because she had inquired about an abortion and was prevented by law from receiving one. She has since become a staunch pro-life advocate. Slightly Different Version ROE v. WADE all started in 1969 when a young girl, Norma L. McCorvey, discovered she was pregnant then realized that she was in desperate need of an abortion. The state of Texas says that, "abortion is allowed and performed in the cases of rape and incest"; anti-abortion state. That being her only problem her friends suggested that she claim the pregnancy to be from a product of rape. However, this plan failed; there was no police report on record documenting the alleged rape. McCorvey attempted to obtain an illegal abortion, but found the unauthorized site closed down by the police. Later on she then was referred to attorneys Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington. The next year, attorneys Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington filed a law suit in a U.S. District Court in Texas on behalf of Norma L. McCorvey. During this time, McCorvey was no longer claiming her pregnancy was the result of rape and then stated she had lied earlier about being raped. The defendant in the case was Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade, representing the State of Texas vs. Norma McCorvey. The US District Court ruled in McCorvey's favor on the merits, but declined to grant an injunction against the enforcement of the laws barring abortion. The District Court based their decision off a previous case, Griswold v. Connecticut, regarding a right to use contraceptives. The case was subsequently appealed and eventually reached the US Supreme Court.
It was ostensibly against Henry Wade, District Attorney of Rockwell County, Texas, who was legally obliged to support the local laws that prohibited abortion. Jane Doe was fou…nd by supporters of abortion. She (real name Norma McCorvey, who is now pro-life) got pregnant in 1969 and was given some bad advice - she told people she was raped, hoping to obtain a legal abortion. Attorneys Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington ended up taking her case and they brought it all the way to the Supreme Court where it was heard in October 1972. In January of 1973, abortion became legal in the United States. Were you looking for more people than that? To fully understand what happened with Roe v Wade, you also need to look at Doe v Bolton (same year) and Giswold v Connecticut (1965). There are other important ones, but those are the big supporting pieces of law.
Privacy in Marrage
The plaintiff in Roe v. Wade, (1973) was identified as "Jane Roe," a common proxy for the name of someone who wishes to remain anonymous. The real plaintiff in the case was No…rma McCorvey. McCorvey never had an abortion. She gave birth to a baby girl who was immediately placed for adoption. McCorvey renounced her pro-choice stance in recent years and has become a Right to Life activist.
Mainly, women of child-bearing age. Some would also say aborted fetuses. Depends on your perspective.
Attorney Henry Wade of Texas
Chief Justice Earl Warren
The supreme court decision in the case Roe v. Wade was 7 votes for Roe, and 2 votes against Roe. ....... legal provision: Due process. the judges in the case were ( by last na…me ): Burger ( wrote a regular conurence..... voted for women to have a right to abbortion.) Douglas ( wrote a regular concurence) Brennan ( voted with the majority) Stewart ( wrote a regular concurence) White ( wrote a dissent ... voted that we should not have the right to abbortion.) Marshall ( voted with the majority) Blackmun ( wrote the majority opinion) Powell ( voted with the majority) Rehnquist ( wrote a dissent.)
why was Roe v. Wade a landmark case
it discusses how roe wanted to abort and wade was against it but it would violate the 4th amendment and basically it discussed the issues of abortion
In State Laws
the decision struck down the state regulation of abortion in the first three months of pregnancy.
well wade first off and the pro life side people against abortion didnt/dont