Federally, the States choose the President with the Electoral College. Sometimes (usually) popular vote dictates how the members vote. Usually, if a State is even 51%:49% for a candidate, the candidate gets 100% of the vote. Thus, it has happened that the lesser popular over all vote was reflected in a greater Electoral College vote. (Huh?)
No.
President Bush won the election over Carry even though Carry had more of the popular vote President Bush won with more electoral college votes; even though the electoral college is supposed to represent the peoples views.
In the 2008 US Presidential election Barack Obama won with 1,288,576 votes to McCain's 1,073,589 votes.
Majority
He won by a small number of votes
Yes, absolutely. In the 2008 presidential election, Mr. Obama received a total of 69,499,428 votes, defeating his challenger, John McCain. In 2012, he received somewhat fewer votes, but he still won decisively with 65,918,507 votes, defeating Mitt Romney.
i think its Abraham Lincon Correct if im wrong
A presidential election is won by the candidate who receives a majority of the electoral votes in the U.S. Electoral College.
A presidential election is won by the candidate who receives a majority of the electoral votes in the U.S. Electoral College.
No single candidate won a majority of the votes cast in the 1860 election. Abraham Lincoln won the most with 1,865,908, 39.7% of all the votes cast. Stephen A. Douglas won 1,380,202 votes, 29.5% of the vote. John C. Breckinridge won 848,019 votes, 18.2% of the vote, and John Bell won 590,901, 12.6%.
If you are referring to the November 2008 presidential election, Barack Obama received 69,456,897 votes, giving him 365 electoral votes. If you are asking about the 2012 presidential election, President Obama won 65,899,660 votes, and 332 electoral votes.
Abraham Lincoln