It allows anyone who publicly performs, copies or makes adaptations to be sued if they do not obtain a license.
There are actually two US c ompanies whose sole business is to track the use of protected material by unauthorized users and collect the royalties.
Yes. Both the song itself and the performance of it are protected separately, so for example sheet music can be controlled by one company, and a recording of the same song by another.
To enable the songwriter and/or artist to ascribe value to their intellectual property, and possibly derive an income from it, so they can stop waiting tables.
Copyright law.
Virtually all recordings are protected by copyright, and all contemporary music. Older works (prior to 1923 in the US) may not be protected, but arrangements, adaptations, performances, and recordings of it would be.
Nowhere, because modern rock and pop music is protected by copyright law.
Legally, nowhere. It's protected by copyright law.
Nowhere. Modern pop music is protected by copyright law and is not legally available for free.
Legally, nowhere, as the music is protected by copyright law. If you don't want to pay, you could transcribe it yourself.
Books and other literary works are protected by copyright law.
Nowhere. Modern music is protected by copyright law and is NOT legally available anywhere for free.
Copyright law is designed to ascribe exclusive rights to the creator of a work.
A website is considered a "literary work" under copyright law.
Technology would typically be protected by patent law, with the exception of software, which can fall under both copyright and patent.
The official website whitehouse.gov is not protected by copyright, pursuant to federal law.