Depends on the bus and what kind of route it runs. Keep in mind that some city buses are entirely electric. A bus driving long distances on the Interstate will likely fare better in mileage than a city bus (one that runs diesel fuel), on account of it not having the stop-and-go traffic. You take a Greyhound bus, tour bus, etc., running down the Interstate, you're probably looking at 7 - 10 miles per gallon... they have engines built for tractor-trailers, but with considerably less weight. City buses... it's really difficult to say, as there are a lot of variables between different cities, plus the fuel type they use.. some cities have made it a point to run straight biodiesel, which, while appealing to the flower children, also produces 12 - 15% less BTU output than ULSD, and that'll result in more fuel being used.
Usually diesel fuel.
Some would argue that by raising the fuel costs would encourage more people to use alternative methods of transport such as trains, busses or even bikes and walking. It would discourage people from using as much fuel due to the cost. It the long run, it might encourage people to live closer to their workplace, reducing the cost of the daily commute and the use of fuel.
Busses rhymes with trusses. Let's use the word in a sentence: Since Mitch Longley didn't have a car, he was forced to take the busses.
You can use liquid H2 as fuel. NASA has been doing it since the 1960's. However, the handling and storage of liquid hydrogen is challenging, and may not be within the capability of the average person to safely manage in a personal vehicle. Liquid hydrogen could be a fuel of choice for professionally managed public transit such as busses and trains.
no. not usually.
6 busses
Tanks and Bendy-busses
Invent a new fuel that doesn't cost the earth, or turn off the engines and take the train.
alot
A bus pass is for busses.
High fuel consumption
About 100 gallons of diesel fuel.