The courts would have to approve this.
A DNA test can prove if the biological father is actually the father. If it is proven he is the father, then he should have all parental rights as any other parent.
A proven biological child is usually entitled to a portion of her father's estate.
Her child's biological father if she has obtained a court order for child support.Her child's biological father if she has obtained a court order for child support.Her child's biological father if she has obtained a court order for child support.Her child's biological father if she has obtained a court order for child support.
A child does not have to have the same last name as the biological father to receive child support from that father.
A birthfather is the biological father of an adopted child, or a person's biological father.
You will need to take a paternity test to prove you are in fact not the biological father. A man just was released from jail in Atlanta because it turns out he was not the biological father and had been previously jailed for falling behind on child support payments... Always take the test to be sure and then you can make the right decision.
Yes. She can petition to terminate the father's parental rights. The court will render a decision after reviewing the evidence presented.
Biological child or Paternal child
No, the father on the birth certificate is financially responsible unless proven that he's not the father by DNA. About 12 years ago in the state of NJ The court ordered me to pay child support to the biological father (Dna test showed I was not the biological father) The court called me the psychological father so in the courts opinion I was her father. And like the biological Mother he also drank it away.
Yes , the biological father will be held legally responsible for the support of his child .
Yes, but she would need to prove that she can provide a better and safer home than the child's biological father. Unless it can be proven that the grandmother's care is in the best interest of the child, it would be unlikely that a court would rule against a child's biological parent.
Yes. The child does not need to be named after the father for him to be obliged to pay child support. He needs to be the biological father, that's all. Child support obligations arise from being the biological parent of a child and not on the child's name.