Yes. This is a classic bailor/bailee situation and the shop was required to protect you car very diligently or pay for any damages incurred. Your insurance if you had it, wouldn't have been involved. The shop is your first recourse and he should have insurance.
A parent is liable of any damages their children do. The car owner is not liable for any damages caused if the vehicle was stolen.
If a person is driving a car and he/she is uninsured but the vehicle in which he is driving is registered and insured to another individual, the registered owner is liable for the damages to the other pwesond's vehicle.
The thief who stole the car is liable for the damages he caused. The owner of the stolen vehicle is a victim also of the same Thief. You my seek compensation from your own insurance policy if you have full coverage options.
Both the Driver and the Owner are liable for the damages. The driver, whether licensed or not is the primarily liable party. The insured passenger owner is secondarily liable for damages by the unlicensed driver he permitted to operate his vehicle.
The insurance company is not liable for paying damages. The minor was knowingly breaking the law by driving w/o a license. The parent of the child will be held liable for damages. As will the person/owner of the vehicle if they knew the minor was not a legally licensed driver. If you let an un liscensed/uninsured minor driver your vehicle, your asking for it. If you werent the parent of the minor, they could sue you as well for neglect.
The owner of the vehicle is usually held liable.
Yes, If you allowed your car to be driven by another while it was uninsured you can lose your drivers license and the other party can "Sue" both the Driver and You the owner jointly or separately for full compensation for any and all damages. As the owner of the vehicle it is your responsibility to ensure your vehicle is covered regardless of who is driving it. You, the "Owner" are equally "Liable" under the law with the driver you allowed to operate the vehicle. If the vehicle was stolen you can file a police theft report and you would not be held liable for the accident.
The Driver "and" the Vehicle Owner are both jointly and severally liable for all damages. She should contact her Insurance Agent for advice as to whether or not the Auto Insurance Policy will provide coverage for the unlicensed driver
Both the "Driver and the Vehicle Owner" can be held jointly and severally "Liable" for an accident. If the driver of your vehicle was at fault and had the permissive use of your vehicle, Both the driver and the vehicle owner can be sued for damages and injuries. The driver, If at fault, would be financially liable because he was the direct cause of the accident. The vehicle owner is financially liable because of fault through the owners negligence in allowing an uninsured driver to operate your vehicle. The legal rational being that had you not allowed this uninsured person to operate your vehicle, the accident would never have occurred. So the owner is also a direct causation factor in the accident through the owners negligence. It's not a good idea to let people drive your vehicle if your not sure your insurance will cover them, Basically it is the responsibility of a vehicle owner to insure that all permissive use drivers are covered. As the owner you can be left with the bill for all damages and injuries sustained as a result of your choice to loan out your vehicle.
The owner of the vehicle is going to be held liable for any damages caused by the underage driver.
no ae u crazy
Generally speaking, no the owner's insurance will not be liable, BUT in some jursidictions, the owner may be liable, IF they didn't take basic care to prevent the theft of their car. So if the car was left unlocked, or the keys were inside the un-locked car, the owner MAY be liable for damages casued by the stolen car. The theory in law here is that the actions of the owner created a situation that allowed the thief easy access to the instrument that caused the damage, namely the car. In some cases, the court may find that the percentage of the blame will be shared by the owner and the thief, fifty fifty, or some other percentage, determined by the Bench. Shared guilt is the concept here.