Want this question answered?
Secondary Source.
The Mayflower Compact is a primary source document because it was created by the passengers aboard the Mayflower in 1620. It directly reflects their intentions and agreements when establishing their government in the New World.
The Declaration of Independence is a primary source, but only if you use the original document or a fascimile of the real document. Someone else's paraphrase of it or opinion would be a secondary source.
Primary - as it is a document produced at the time. It is not some later report.
Primary source: A historical document written by an eyewitness; secondary source: a historical document interpreting the accounts of eyewitnesses
No, it's a primary source historical document.
well, primary source is when you find something, by not using any evidence the man was reading a newspaper. secondary is when you find information from the primary source. the man found a newspaper add for a gardener. . . sorry it hard to explain xxx or...
secondary source
A historical document written by an eyewitness would be a primary source, providing firsthand information and perspective on an event. On the other hand, a document interpreting eyewitness accounts and other accounts of an event would be a secondary source, offering analysis and interpretation of the primary sources.
No, a court document is considered a primary source as it contains firsthand information and data related to a legal proceeding. Secondary sources are interpretations or analyses of primary sources, like research articles or textbooks.
Interviews are primary sources 'cause the interviewers are getting the information from the source.
When researching American independence or almost any founding-period subject, the Declaration of Independence is indeed a primary source. The difference between primary sources and secondary sources hinges on this simple distinction: a primary source is (or was) "there", while a secondary source is (or was) not "there" but instead talks "about" it.