It totally depends on what business you are running, such as a builder would want a labor intensive business, whilst a car maker would want a capital intensive business, disserent businesses need different things.
A bank or investment company would be considered 'capital intensive' , a construction company or landscaping company would be considered 'labour intensive' because they employ more people to try for the same gains.
The capital-intensive nature of paper manufacturing means that cheaper overseas labor has less of an impact on manufacturing costs than in other, more labor-intensive industries.
Disadvantages of capital intensive are:-Workers get bored with their job-Need to retrain workers/managers-Profit will decrease in short term-May need to build or find bigger building for machineryAdvantages of capital intensive are:-More profit in long term-Benefit from economies of scale-Increased productivity-Cheaper 'labor'
Hog production was rapidly becoming less labor-intensive and more capital-intensive, a condition that had not been problematic for corporate outfits able to bring significant resources to bear.
Relatively poor countries often have abundant labor resources and limited access to capital. Therefore, they tend to rely on labor-intensive technology as it is more cost-effective for them. On the other hand, rich countries have higher levels of capital and advanced technology, enabling them to invest in more capital-intensive technologies that increase productivity and efficiency.
Assuming that both are available to do a production task, using labor allows the business to be more flexible to varying demands. An example is seasonal production such as farming. The farm owner can scale the amount of workers hired to fit the work available.
Word of mouth.
i-xi-mmiii capital letters are more preferable.
Intensive labor force could put more emphasis on quality, whereas a ton of intense machinery would just do, do, do without any regard to quality that was not programmed into it.
Simple answer: the Hecksler-Ohlin model of trade describes that countries, as they specialise in goods in which they possess comparative advantage, devote labour/capital to that good. In this case, other goods are pushed out of the market as the dominant input (labour or capital) in the advantaged good rises in price. I.e.) China specialises in manufacturing; manfacturing is labour-intensive. Labour and capital shift to manufacturing. The price of the two rises, pushing other goods out of the market, especially capital-heavy goods (since labour is needed in manufacturing). In general, many countries specialise in a good because they possess plentiful inputs needed for that good. I.e.) The U.S. has a lot of capital. Therefore, capital has more competition and is cheaper to access. Capital-intensive goods are cheaper to produce, and so more capital-intensive goods are produced with higher profit-margins.
It is possible for competition to force competitors into capital intensive production in order to compete. When a firm does this, they can gain a competitive edge over others in the industry and get more customers because their competition will have to charge more to cover the expenses.
xv-iii-mmiii capital numerals are more preferable but they both have the same values.