The disimilarities between Bismarck and patel are:
bismark belived that the sheding of blood alone can unify the various states and adopted the famous policy called "Iron and Blood. Bismark used all his tactics to create a war that he wanted to win and create a unified Germany. But Patel used his tactics by providing many offers to the kingdoms that ruled in those times so that they thmselves became unified as India but when this did not work he to went on war. Bismark didnt think more of peaceful means.
the similarities between them are that they both wanted their respective countries to be united!!
Similarities and differences between the methods adopted by the two leaders:
Similarities between Sardar Vallabai Patel and Bismarck
• Both were great leaders
• Both worked for the unification of their respective countries, India and Germany
• Both of them consolidated the disintegrated states in their countries
Differences between Sardar Vallabai Patel and Bismarck
Sardar Vallabai Patel
He used non – violence methods.
He adopted the techniques of warfare and violence.
Bismarck
He united India and princely states only through peace efforts.
He united Germany and Austrian States that were under its control only through war.
There are many similarities between the Bismark and the Vallabhai Patel. Bismark used political tactics and a famous policy called "Blood And Iron Policy". On the other hand Patel used this Bismarks policy in the unification of Hyderabad and also used many tactics to unify Junagadh such as holding a plebisite.
But there was a considerable difference between both of them because bismark belived that the sheding of blood alone can unify these states and adopted the famous policy called "Iron and Blood" ( later edited to Blood and Iron ). Bismark used all his tactics to create a war that he wanted to win and create a unified Germany. But Patel used his tactics by providing many offers to the kingdoms that ruled in those times so that they thmselves became unified as India but when this did not work he to went on war. Bismark didnt think more of peaceful means.
e
no
both are used to solve linear programming problems
Two key points to remember about constructors are that they have no return type and their names must exactly match the class name. Methods can have any names and can have any return types.
The similarities are: a. They are both java basic object types b. They both can contain variables and methods (With difference being class methods have implementation code whereas the interface methods can only have declarations) c. They can both be inherited using Inheritance (extends keyword for classes and implements keyword for interfaces)
A traditional curriculum uses older methods like lecturing in a classroom. Progressive programs experiment with newer methods like online learning.
Both Otto von Bismarck and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel played crucial roles in unifying their respective countries through statecraft and diplomacy. Both leaders utilized diplomacy, strategic alliances, and military force to unite their fragmented nations. However, Bismarck's methods were more focused on using warfare and power politics to achieve unification, while Patel's approach emphasized negotiation and non-violent resistance to integrate princely states into India.
no
As regards similarities between Bismarck and Patel, I have no specialized knowledge. Both of them used a 3-stage system for uniting their countries; 1) Invite Union, pointing out the advantages. 2) Take advantage of the fact of human nature that people who will not unite FOR anything will unite AGAINST something - Austria/France, or Britain/Pakistan. 3) By the time only a few states are left outside the Union, the Union will be strong enough to incorporate the rest by force.
bismark used his tactful way of unifying but patel was not like that
Both Bismarck and Sardar Patel used a combination of diplomacy and warfare to unify their respective countries (Germany and India). They both relied on strategic alliances and military force to consolidate territories and centralize power. Additionally, they both faced opposition from regional powers and internal factions, which they skillfully managed to overcome through negotiation and political maneuvering.
ann
both are used to solve linear programming problems
They are both methods which use heat to separate mixtures.
They were civil rights leaders and used non violent methods of revolution.
Bismarck was willing to do whatever it took to achieve unification. He was known to be a good leader, but dealt with his opposition harshly, earning him the title of "Tyrant." Bismarck's social reforms were pioneering, however, his methods of rule were separate and apart from his reforms. His reforms did not justify the extremes he used.
Otto von Bismarck, the Iron Chancellor of Germany, used a combination of realpolitik, diplomacy, and military force to unify Germany under Prussian leadership in 1871. Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, known as the Iron Man of India, played a crucial role in integrating over 500 princely states into the newly independent India through negotiations, diplomacy, and the threat of military force, known as the "iron fist in a velvet glove" approach. Both leaders were instrumental in unifying their respective countries through skillful diplomacy and strategic use of power, although in different historical contexts and circumstances.
Two key points to remember about constructors are that they have no return type and their names must exactly match the class name. Methods can have any names and can have any return types.