0
Surveys tell us that most people think large differences in pay are necessary to get people to work hard. This opinion illustrates an argument closest to which approach?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
structural functional
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
This opinion illustrates a reinforcement theory approach, which suggests that providing large differences in pay serves as a form of positive reinforcement to encourage individuals to work hard. It aligns with the belief that rewards play a significant role in shaping behavior.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is an example for name calling fallacy?
An example of name-calling fallacy would be if someone dismissed an argument by calling the person making the argument a "liar" without providing any evidence to disprove the argument itself. This type of fallacy aims to attack the person rather than addressing the actual content of the argument.
How does Carnegie use the doctrine of social Darwinism to support his argument?
Carnegie used the doctrine of social Darwinism to justify his belief in the "survival of the fittest" in business. He argued that successful industrialists like himself were naturally superior and deserved their wealth, while those who struggled or failed were not fit for success. This belief allowed Carnegie to argue against government intervention or regulation in business, promoting a laissez-faire approach.
How can people with vastly different viewpoints use the same argument to defend their views?
People with different viewpoints can use the same arguments to defend their views by interpreting the evidence or information selectively to support their pre-existing beliefs. They may also frame the argument in a way that aligns with their values or biases, allowing them to find common ground in certain aspects while diverging in others. Additionally, they might rely on different assumptions or interpretations of the argument's premises to reach contrasting conclusions.
Why is race and ethnicity discrimination more important than gender discrimination?
Race and ethnicity discrimination is not more important than gender discrimination, as both are serious societal issues that can have significant negative impacts on individuals and groups. Discrimination based on any characteristic, whether race, ethnicity, gender, or others, is unjust and harmful, and efforts to address and combat all forms of discrimination are important for promoting equality and social justice.
What can be a strong counter argument about not having to wear uniforms?
A strong counter argument against not having to wear uniforms is that uniforms promote school safety by easily identifying students on campus and quickly identifying intruders. Additionally, uniforms can help reduce peer pressure related to fashion choices and social status among students. Lastly, uniforms can foster a sense of equality and unity among students from different socio-economic backgrounds.
What illustrates the rhetorical element ethos?
An author's credibility, expertise, or trustworthiness can illustrate the rhetorical element ethos. This can be conveyed through qualifications, experience, or a sincere tone that establishes the author as believable and worth listening to.
What are limits in maths?
Limits (or limiting values) are values that a function may approach (but not actually reach) as the argument of the function approaches some given value. The function is usually not defined for that particular value of the argument.
The best way to view organizational behavior is through contingency approach build an argument to support this statement?
The contingency approach suggests that there is no one-size-fits-all solution to managing organizations, as each situation requires a unique approach based on the specific context. By viewing organizational behavior through this lens, it allows for a more nuanced understanding of how different factors such as structure, culture, and leadership style interact and influence behavior within the organization. This approach emphasizes the importance of adapting to changing circumstances and tailoring management practices to fit the specific needs of the organization at any given time.
discuss briefly the similarities and differences between strong and weak arguments and cogent and uncogent argument support your discussion with your own examples?
discuss briefly the similarities and differences between strong and weak arguments and cogent and uncogent argument support your discussion with your own examples
What does it mean to dream others arguing like a little fighting?
The dream illustrates a struggle you are having with yourself. The argument represents a choice or decision that you are trying to make, and how you are "fighting" with yourself.
What is an argument in favor of affirmation action?
legislation is necessary to allow minorities to overcome generations of discrimination
Which sentence best illustrates the author's central argument in this passage?
u are support to answer it not me
Is it true that a necessary feature of an argument is that it involves a moral topic?
Moral topics needn't be a necessary or essential feature of an argument. Material topics are most often very good to be argued about. Only that meaningful arguments involve some topic, moral or material.
Why it is necessary to critique a scientific argument before it is accepted.?
The purpose of the critique is to insure that the scientific argument has been properly researched and investigated and no possible alternate arguments have been ignored.
Why it is necessary to critique a scientific argument before it is accepted?
The purpose of the critique is to insure that the scientific argument has been properly researched and investigated and no possible alternate arguments have been ignored.
What exactly is an ontological argument?
It is a philosophical argument that God exists. While many philosopher's theories had many differences in derivation and reasoning, the conclusion to all ontological arguments was that the superior being of God is a reality.
How do you have judge rule in your favor?
By having the most convincing argument backed up by the facts necessary to prove your innocence.
