0
The unification of Germany under otto von Bismarck demonstrates the?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
impact of nationalism
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Did Otto Von Bismarck single-handedly achieve German unification?
One can not solely claim that Otto Von Bismarck brought about German unification. It was a number of factors which worked in his favor. For example, the Zollverein was an effective economic force in unifying some of the disgruntled southern states with Prussia. But in relation to Bismarck 'single-handedly' achieving German Unification, one could state that he did so pragmatically, in such events as the annexation of Luxembourg, which caused an upsurge in nationalism and anti-french feeling throughout Germany, this allowed him to have a huge military budget passed and gave him the ample opportunity to defeat Napoleon II. One could not just argue that Bismarck single-handedly achieved German unification, it was brought about through 'blood and iron' and not 'coal and iron' as Keynes later argues. Pragmatic actions coupled with the superiority of the free trading Zollverein under the helm of Von Roon. It should also be noted that Bismarck never planned full German Unification, a key primary source that concludes this can be found in a letter to his wife, which reads 'There is nothing left to achieve in our lifetime'. But evidently the military pacts Prussia had made with southern states on the eve of warfare meant that if warfare broke out, Prussia would have political dominance over those states. Nationalism within Germany at the time can not be credited as a significant factor in German unification. Numbers within nationalist groups were always relatively low, and it is important not to confuse nationalism with patriotism. Thus concluding this short response. It was pragmatic Bismarck actions that brought about German unification, but Germany was certainly not unified by Bismarck 'single-handedly'.
What countries were under western influence after World War 2?
Finland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, UK, Ireland, Netherlands, Belgium, France, West Germany, Switzerland, Italy, Albania, Spain, Portugal, Greece, and Turkey.
How much of western Europe did hilter control by the time the US joined?
Just about all of western Europe was either under Hitler's direct control or influence by the time Germany declared war on the US, December 11, 1941. In Scandinavia German troops occupied Norway and Denmark. Finland was a German ally, on the principal that my enemy's enemy is my friend. Stalin had just finished humiliating himself by picking a fight with the Finns and then performing so badly that some believe the poor Russian performance against the tiny Finnish army encouraged Hitler to go ahead and invade Russia. Sweden was officially neutral but definitely within the Nazi sphere of influence, and was the source of most Nazi iron ore, as well as crucial items such as machined parts and ball bearings. German troops occupied Belgium and the Netherlands, as well as northern France. The rest of France, and all of France's overseas possessions and colonies, were under the control of the collaborationist Vichy regime, a Nazi puppet installed after Germany invaded and defeated France. Spain was under the control of Francisco Franco, a fascist dictator who won his civil war with help from Hitler and Mussolini. Portugal also had a fascist regime. Italy was under Mussolini, the original fascist but a definite junior partner in his alliance with Germany. Austria had been extinguished in 1938 and absorbed into greater Germany as the province of Ostmark. Czechoslovakia likewise lost its independence to Germany. Romania, Bulgaria and Hungary were German allies. Yugoslavia was conquered in two weeks in the summer of 1941. Greece was also occupied by the Nazis. Only Switzerland remained officially neutral on mainland Europe, but even the Swiss had to allow free passage to German trains back and forth from Italy.
Why was Holy Roman Empire created?
The precedent of the Holy Roman Empire was the Carolingian empire established by Charlemagne in 800. This empire covered France, Italy and Germany, which at the time included Holland, Luxembourg, eastern France, Switzerland, Austria, and Bohemia (the Czech Republic). This empire ended in 888 when the Carolingian dynasty died out. In Germany there was lack of unity and a lot of fighting between the princes. France broke away and Italy came under the control of other rulers. Henry I the Fowler managed to restore royal control over Germany. His son Otto I strengthened central control in Germany. In 961 he conquered Italy and restored the old empire minus France. He was crowned emperor by the pope and named himself Holy Roman Emperor, modelling himself on Charlemagne who had been given the title of Roman Emperor. His empire was called Holy Roman Empire.
What did balkan crisis do to Europe?
The Balkan crisis provided the spark which started the First World War. Austria-Hungary felt it had to respond to such a provocation, but the system of alliances in Europe - Germany/Austria/Italy on one side and Britain/France/Russia on the other - meant that the assassination in Sarajevo soon escalated. At the end of the war, Austria-Hungary had ceased to be an Empire under Habsburg rule, Germany was no longer a monarchy but a weak and unloved democracy, Russia was the first communist state and Britain and France we so scarred from the experience of war that they sought collective system via the League of Nations to avoid any war in future.
What form of government was Germany after the unification of Germany?
After the unification under Bismarck 871, the German Empire was a constitutional monarchy.
Who was responsible for the unification of Germany?
Otto Von Bismarck unified the German states under the Prussian king.WilliamBismarck
What man led the movement to unify Germany?
Otto von Bismarck, as the Prussian Chancellor under Wilhelm I, was almost inadvertently responsible for the unification of Germany.
How did bismark affect the number of German states?
Circa 1870, Otto von Bismarck was the principal architect of the unification of Germany under Prussian leadership.
Who was the iron chancellor in Germany?
Otto von Bismarck pursued the idea of German unification. As a result, Germany grew into a powerful empire under its Iron Chancellor.RGUKT IIIT NUZVID: N091528
Who was most responsible for the unification of Germany Napoleon?
Otto Bismarck (later von Bismarck), the first-ever German chancellor, he became chancellor of a unified Germany in 1871. He was already chancellor of the most powerful state in the German Confederation (1815-1866).
What role did prussia play in German unification?
Prussia was crucial to the unification of Germany. Under the rule of Otto von Bismarck, Prussia engaged in and won the wars that brought together the nation states that make up Germany.
How was Germany under Bismarck and Japan under Emperor Meiji similar?
industrialization
Under Bismarck Germany took a pioneering role in?
realpolitik
Did Otto Von Bismarck single handedly achieve German unification?
One can not solely claim that Otto Von Bismarck brought about German unification. It was a number of factors which worked in his favor. For example, the Zollverein was an effective economic force in unifying some of the disgruntled southern states with Prussia. But in relation to Bismarck 'single-handedly' achieving German Unification, one could state that he did so pragmatically, in such events as the annexation of Luxembourg, which caused an upsurge in nationalism and anti-french feeling throughout Germany, this allowed him to have a huge military budget passed and gave him the ample opportunity to defeat Napoleon II. One could not just argue that Bismarck single-handedly achieved German unification, it was brought about through 'blood and iron' and not 'coal and iron' as Keynes later argues. Pragmatic actions coupled with the superiority of the free trading Zollverein under the helm of Von Roon. It should also be noted that Bismarck never planned full German Unification, a key primary source that concludes this can be found in a letter to his wife, which reads 'There is nothing left to achieve in our lifetime'. But evidently the military pacts Prussia had made with southern states on the eve of warfare meant that if warfare broke out, Prussia would have political dominance over those states. Nationalism within Germany at the time can not be credited as a significant factor in German unification. Numbers within nationalist groups were always relatively low, and it is important not to confuse nationalism with patriotism. Thus concluding this short response. It was pragmatic Bismarck actions that brought about German unification, but Germany was certainly not unified by Bismarck 'single-handedly'.
Did Otto Von Bismarck single-handedly achieve German unification?
One can not solely claim that Otto Von Bismarck brought about German unification. It was a number of factors which worked in his favor. For example, the Zollverein was an effective economic force in unifying some of the disgruntled southern states with Prussia. But in relation to Bismarck 'single-handedly' achieving German Unification, one could state that he did so pragmatically, in such events as the annexation of Luxembourg, which caused an upsurge in nationalism and anti-french feeling throughout Germany, this allowed him to have a huge military budget passed and gave him the ample opportunity to defeat Napoleon II. One could not just argue that Bismarck single-handedly achieved German unification, it was brought about through 'blood and iron' and not 'coal and iron' as Keynes later argues. Pragmatic actions coupled with the superiority of the free trading Zollverein under the helm of Von Roon. It should also be noted that Bismarck never planned full German Unification, a key primary source that concludes this can be found in a letter to his wife, which reads 'There is nothing left to achieve in our lifetime'. But evidently the military pacts Prussia had made with southern states on the eve of warfare meant that if warfare broke out, Prussia would have political dominance over those states. Nationalism within Germany at the time can not be credited as a significant factor in German unification. Numbers within nationalist groups were always relatively low, and it is important not to confuse nationalism with patriotism. Thus concluding this short response. It was pragmatic Bismarck actions that brought about German unification, but Germany was certainly not unified by Bismarck 'single-handedly'.
How was Germany able to grow as an industrial power under Bismarck?
ample iron and coal resources.
