Yes it was.
Well yes Nationalism was part of what caused WW1 but not the big reason. The bigger reason was the formation of pacts and alliances. These alliances said that if one country were to go to war with another, all countries in that alliance would fight with them. This idea was a big mistake because once 2 small countries started fighting, the whole world became entangled in war. WW2 is more closely related to Nationalism than WW1.
It could be argued so because the war was sparked by a single man with a pistol and an intense belief in nationalism. However, from that point the war which still could have been avoided was caused by the defects of Imperialism, volatile imperial alliances, and a lack of diplomacy and communications.
the maxim gun
its all fransisco dang fault he caused the world war 1
It caused tensions between countries (further enhancing the conflict between Germany and Britain) and it ignited the flame that then caused militarism, nationalism, and alliances.
You can say Hitler caused WW2, but not WW1.
Which one? 1905 or 1917? Czar was nuts, feudalism/capitalism suck, and the russians were getting their asses handed to them in WW1.
no it was germany,hungary and italy who caused most of the damage in ww1
the sinking of lusitania
Because Serbia for example wanted to be its own nation from Austria-Hungary.
Because WW1 caused them to improvise!!!
Duke Franz Ferdinand
WW1, it was caused by the assassination of archduke franz ferdinand
EGYPT!!!!!!!!!!!
the maxim gun
the assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand
It is normally created by big booms that happened WW1 and WW2
Treaty of Versailles
The Treaty of Versailles