He thought that selling indulgences were nonsense, and that purgatory did not exist. Indulgences were sold to relatives of the dead, and the Pope would promise them that the souls of the dead would spend less time in purgatory. Luther nailed 95 of these arguments onto the church door in Wittenburg.
By bringing out into the open what they perceived as false doctrines and ecclesiastic malpractice by the Roman Catholic Church, especially the sale of indulgences. The reformers saw this as evidence of the systemic corruption of the Church's Roman Catholic Church hierarchy, which included the Pope.
the creation of new churches in Western Europe formed.many christian churches had appeared in Europe
Many commentators said that the Second Vatican Council was the Council that Luther would have wanted. Many of the things he opposed were clarified here.
Martin Luther did not "split" from the Catholic Church, he left the Catholic Church and started his own. That is technically known as apostasy and heresy. The Orthodox Churches split from the Catholic Church, Martin Luther apostatized from the Catholic Church - two completely different things.
- Christ is the spiritual leader of the church- A person can talk directly with God. - People should be able to read and interpret the Bible themselves
Roman Catholic AnswerThe Catholic Church as taught nothing but that which She has received from Her founder, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit, for over twenty centuries. Martin Luther taught his own philosophy and religion in order to justify that kind of life he wanted to live. The Catholic Church teaches that man is justified by the gratuitous gift of God in baptism and that from that moment on justification is a process in which he must cooperate, by the Grace given him by God, in his own justification. This is taught all through Scripture. Martin Luther denied all of this, saying that the only thing necessary was to believe, and ignore the rest of Scripture, and that you will die and instantly go to heaven. The Catholic Church has always taught the doctrine that Our Blessed Savior taught, in that, God gives us the grace to cooperate with Him and to become perfect - as nothing imperfect can enter heaven. If we fail to complete that in this life, God, in His infinite mercy, perfects us after death, in a process called "purgatory". Also, we can help those not yet perfect through our prayers, this is because we are all part of the Mystical Body of Christ, and are all being saved together. Martin Luther denied all of this, he denied that man was capable of being perfected. He denied that man was capable of cooperating with God's grace. He viewed man as a totally worthless thing - a pile of manure covered with snow (pardon me, his words, not mine). All differences between the teachings can be reduced to: the teachings of the Catholic Church are those of God, they are divine and capable, through the might of God, in saving a person. The teachings of Martin Luther are so many figments of his sin obsessed imagination and can do nothing, as he himself taught.
One would think that Martin Luther held the Bible to be the final authority in religious matters, but his actions prove otherwise. If you read Martin Luther, you soon realize that he regarded himself as the final authority, above the Bible -which he repeatedly proved by editing the Bible to agree with himself, above the Bishops and the Pope, which he also said openly, and against the entire of Christian history, including the Fathers, which he also said.
Since you can't say what martin bashir's faith is, to me he demonstrates christain vertue Many times, on MSNBC, he qoutes scripture principles ( from his heart ) and he couldn't do that unless he were a christain, a believer in the messag of Jesus Christ. You'd have to agree.
Because there were several things about the Catholic Church which he didn't agree with.Because there were several things about the Catholic Church which he didn't agree with.Because there were several things about the Catholic Church which he didn't agree with.Because there were several things about the Catholic Church which he didn't agree with.
Martin Luther mostly criticized the Catholic Church on the teaching about indulgences, to start with. Although most of his criticism was unjust and showed more his lack of knowledge than any problem with indulgences. However, he posted his criticisms in the 95 Theses, which you may read at the link below:
There were a lot of things wrong with the church at the time of martin luther. He was a monk and scholar and he didn't agree with the church on a lot of things. The church sold bits of paper called indulgences to the people and told them that if they bought them they would go to heaven. Martin Luther wrote the 95 theses and nailed them to the door of wittenburg church. The 95 theses were all the things he thought wrong with the church. Pope Leo X was disgusted by his actions and sent him a papal bull, a formal letter excommunicating him from the church. Martin Luther burned it in front of the public. Martin Luther wanted the church to correct itself because they were cheating the people and giving them false belief.
Martin Luther did not start a new religion, but rather initiated the Protestant Reformation in the 16th century by challenging certain practices of the Catholic Church. This movement led to the formation of various Protestant denominations but did not result in the creation of a singular new religion.
¨The Protestant Reformation was caused by Martin Luther, during the 16th century. ¨The Reformation did not occur in orthodox Christianity in Russia or what was left of the Byzantine empire in Greece. ¨It was called the protestant reformation because it was originally an attempt to reform the traditional institutions of the western church but also supporting the motivation of offerings for the means of salvation. ¨Martin Luther became very unhappy with the Roman Catholic Church and how it had became. One particular practice that he didn't like was when priests will sell "entrances to heaven" to people in exchange for money. The Roman Catholic Church were selling indulgences, saying that if you buy it, you have salvation, and people like Martin Luther didn't agree with that, saying that by God's grace we are saved. ¨Luther later posted all his complaints about the Catholic Church in the door of a Catholic church thus starting the Protestant Reformation.
Bottom line? Because Martin Luther started his own church out of nothing, and to give it some semblance of authority, he has to come up with something, so he used the Bible. The only problem with this is that he completely ignored the fact that Jesus Christ never wrote the Bible. Jesus Christ founded a Church and commanded that they go out and convert people. As part of that work, their words were collected by the church and put into a book we now know as the New Testament - as part of her preaching the Gospel of Christ. Obviously, the Bible was never intended to be the complete Christianity, and it even says so! So Martin Luther editedthe Bible to take out the parts he didn't agree with and change the other parts to agree with him. His ideas differed from the Catholic Church since the Catholic Church only teaches the ideas that Jesus gave her, and Martin Luther taught only his own ideas.
Martin Luther did not "split" from the Catholic Church, he left the Catholic Church and started his own. That is technically known as apostasy and heresy. The Orthodox Churches split from the Catholic Church, Martin Luther apostatized from the Catholic Church - two completely different things.
I would not say "Protestant Christianity" was "FOUNDED," to me the best way to explain it would be started by a spark, Martin Luther's nailing the 95 Thesis to the church door in Wittenberg, because of differences he had with the Roman Church [Luther did not want to leave the church... He was forced]. Different Christian denominations began because of their disagreements with Martin Luther and then their disagreements with each other.
He was frustrated and did not agree with what the church was doing. for example: - the pope had kids - the church was making money of indulgences (slips of paper pardoning sins) and stuff like that.
.Catholic AnswerMartin Luther took solemn life-long vows after many years of prayerful reflection, of obedience, poverty, and chastity. With no reflection, and no permission, he broke every one of these vows, abandoned his vocation, left his Order, and proceeded to make up his own religion to suit himself. To do this, he rewrote the Bible, inserting words in where it suited him, and trashing whole books of the Most Holy Bible with which he did not agree. In short, Martin Luther abandoned the Catholic Church, which is the Mystical Body of Christ, and so abandoned God to make up his own Church, and his own god. For a complete look at his history, you may pick up the book at the link below:
His real name was Michael Luther King. The reason he changed his name was because he admired Martin Luther. During the 1500's Martin Luther didn't agree with the Catholic Churches decisions. So he decided to write the 95 theses which is a list of 95 reasons why he didn't agree with them. Some of the reasons were because: He didn't agree with them charging for indulgences (forgiveness from god) because they weren't in the Bible. He also didn't agree with them charging for marriages and baptisms or the fact that they wanted to become more powerful and be even with Kings, Queens, etc. Martin Luther King admired him because he chose to do something about what he believed in.
Another answer from our community:Martin Luther's "stand" against the Catholic Church was that the Catholic Church stood for the Gospel and morality, and Martin Luther failed at both, so he rewrote the Gospel and made up a new "Christianity" which did not call him to be a moral person to be saved.