deductive approach is explain from the general statement to specific statement and inductive approach is explain from the specific statement to general statement
Inductive research involves collecting data, identifying patterns, and developing theories based on those patterns, while deductive research starts with a hypothesis and uses data to test and confirm or reject that hypothesis. Inductive research is exploratory and generates new theories, while deductive research is confirmatory, testing existing theories.
Inductive approach involves generating theories based on observations and patterns identified in the data, while deductive approach tests existing theories against empirical evidence. Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations, whereas deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific predictions. Both approaches are used in scientific research to build knowledge and test hypotheses.
Formal research techniques are structured, systematic, and follow a specific methodology, such as surveys, experiments, or case studies. Informal research techniques are more unstructured and rely on personal observations, experiences, or interactions for gathering information, such as interviews or focus groups. Formal research tends to be quantitative, while informal research is often qualitative in nature.
A research schedule outlines the timeline and sequence of tasks to be completed during a research project, while a research questionnaire is a tool used to collect data or information from research participants. The schedule helps to organize and plan the research process, while the questionnaire is a specific instrument used to gather data for analysis.
Primary research involves collecting data directly from original sources through methods like surveys or experiments, while secondary research involves gathering information from existing sources like books or articles. Primary research is more time-consuming and expensive but offers firsthand insights, while secondary research is quicker and less costly but may not address specific research needs as directly.
A research report is a formal document that presents findings from original research, often including data and analysis. An essay, on the other hand, is a more flexible form of writing that presents an argument or viewpoint on a topic, supported by evidence or reasoning. Research reports tend to be more structured and objective, while essays allow for more creativity and expression of personal perspectives.
Inductive approach involves generating theories based on observations and patterns identified in the data, while deductive approach tests existing theories against empirical evidence. Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations, whereas deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific predictions. Both approaches are used in scientific research to build knowledge and test hypotheses.
Inductive research is more applicable to policy formulation and policy evaluation.
Qualitative research primarily uses inductive reasoning, which involves starting with specific observations or data points and then developing general conclusions or theories based on those observations. This approach allows researchers to explore deeper meanings, perspectives, and relationships within their data.
Normative deductive approach starts with a theory and uses deduction to derive hypotheses, while inductive approach starts with observations and uses induction to formulate a theory. The deductive approach is useful when researchers have a strong theoretical foundation and want to test specific hypotheses, while the inductive approach is useful when exploring new areas where little theory exists. The usefulness of each approach depends on the research question and context.
Inductive research approaches are more widely used than Deductive by the scientific community, but they both have there strength and weaknesses. Inductive method: -Strengths: The inductive method produces concrete conclusions about nature that are backed by a variety of observational evidence. When one of an inductive arguments premises are perceived as false, other observational evidence can be added to the premises to save the argument, this is not the case with deductive reasoning. -Weaknesses: The inductive method produces conclusions that go beyond what there premises warrant. In other words, inductive arguments take a limited amount of observations to provide a universal conclusion, which could still be false. For example, someone observes 10,000 dogs and finds that they all have flees, then inductively concludes that all dogs have flees. This is a situation where overwhelming observational evidence (10,000 dogs have flees) points to an inductively reasoned false conclusion (All dogs have flees). Deductive Method: -Strengths: Deductive reasoning dosent require painstakingly observing a variety of observational evidence to reach a conclusion. One can start off with a generally accepted axiom, or statement, and deduce conclusions based on that axiom. -Weaknesses: Deductive reasoning can make permanent the logical fallacies we have today. In other words, if you use an axiom to deduce a variety of conclusions, and that axiom turns out to be false, all of the conclusions following that axiom are false as a result. hope this helps!
moving from general conclusions to specific observations
Inductive research starts off with specific observations and move toward general ideas or theory to capture what they show. (Qualitative) Deductive Research starts with a general idea or theory and then moves to test it by looking at specific observations. (Quantitative)
deductive
Scientists use deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning when looking at problems. Deductive reasoning involves making specific conclusions based on general principles or theories. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations or theories based on specific observations or evidence. Both types of reasoning are important in forming hypotheses, making predictions, and drawing conclusions in scientific research.
Quantitative research and analysis has to do with deductive reasoning not necessarily the quantity. Quantitative research and analysis are based on facts and some forms are structured interviews, surveys, questionnaire's, etc. "it is deductivist and objectivist and incorporates a natural science model of research" -SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODS CDN edition Alan bryman and James teevan Qualitative-"inductive, constuctionist, and interpretivist" from above source this means it has to do with opinions and feelings some methods are unstructured interviews and focus groups
No, action research is typically considered to be an inductive approach. In action research, observations and data from the field are used to generate hypotheses or theories, rather than starting with a pre-determined hypothesis and testing it through data collection. It involves a cyclical process of observation, reflection, planning, and action to bring about change and improvement.
The microscope has led scientists to put more focus on inductive research methods.