The meaning of valid is justifiable and once being relevant and meaningful. Accurate means something is free and true without error.
Valid means that the argument leads to a true conclusion, given that its premises are true, but if an argument is valid that does not necessarily mean the conclusion is correct, as its premises may be wrong. A sound argument, on the other hand, in addition to being valid all of its premises are true and hence its conclusion is also true.
what is the difference between the values and tradition
What is the difference between a C; and an S?
difference between abstract and conclusion
An argument is said to be formally valid if it is valid in virtue of its form. For example, the argumentAll men are mortal.Socrates is a man.Therefore, Socrates is mortal.is formally valid because its validity does not depend on its content (plug in any predicates [some limitations apply], the argument will still be valid). E.g.All pigs can fly.Wilbur is a pig.Therefore, Wilbur can fly.(Valid, but not sound, since the first premise is false!)Now, material validity is different in that arguments are valid but not in virtue of their form. Recall that validity is defined as 'no possible valuation which makes the premises true and the conclusion false'. So the following argument is also valid:John had a nightmare.Therefore, John had a dream.If you formalise this argument, it would be "Fa, so Ga", which is invalid (or following Alex Oliver's terminology, impure, for it has both valid and invalid instances). So there seems to be a gap between validity and formal validity (i.e. not all valid arguments are formally valid). That's what Buridan called 'material validity'.
a valid trust is true and an enforcebale trust can be enforced
A valid deductive argument will have a valid premise and conclusion and a fallacy may be true, it all matters on how you came to the conclusion.
The difference between genuine and original is very simple. Genuine is something that is real while original is the first of something.
Facts cannot be valid. They can only be true or false. Arguments, on the other hand, can be valid. A valid argument in one which must have a true conclusion provided that the premises are true (no guarantee of that though).
A faulty generalization is a statement that's not true while a valid generalization is a true statement.
The requirement for a valid XHTML is that all the tags should be closed. This is actually the difference between HTML and XHTML.
There is no difference. Neither will work because neither is valid in C.
A valid conclusion is an accurate answer which sums up the whole of the topic.
a accurate result would be true as possible but a reliable result would be one that is compared
valid contract is one which satisfies all the condition of contract.on the other hand void contract is one which ceases to be enforceable by law.
Accuract is how accurate you are at somehting and rreproducibility is how reproducibility you are at something.
percent includes all answers, whereas valid percent excludes missing answers of I don't know or blanks