The primary claim by those who oppose hate crime legislation is that it only protects certain groups of people. Some claim that special protection is given to only those who have a certain status.
The argument is that a person should be arrested for what they do, not what they think. When hate crimes laws are taken to the extreme, they become a form of thought control. Hate crimes laws can be used as excuses to take freedom, punish certain types of speech, or turn non-crimes into crimes, and misdemeanors into felonies.
Another problem they have with such laws is that they send the message that some people are more important than others or deserve more rights. While such laws are supposed to help level the playing field, they can also be used as a weapon to oppress certain people.
The primary crime scene is where the initial criminal activity or incident took place. It is usually the location where the most significant evidence related to the crime can be found. Proper documentation and preservation of the primary crime scene are essential for a thorough investigation.
The primary crime scene is the place where a crime was first committed.
To fight or contend against; oppose vigorously: to combat crime.
Very generally speaking, hate crime legislation is legislation to add stiffer penalties for crime perpetrated against another person for the sole reason of hatred. For instance, if two guys get in a fight over a parking space, that is not a hate crime. It's just simple assault. If a white guy beats up a black guy solely be he is black, that is a hate crime.
primary crime scene
The primary crime scene is the place where a crime was first committed.
Yes, there can be more than one crime scene associated with a single crime. Different locations may be involved in the commission of a crime, such as where evidence is found or where different parts of the criminal act occurred. Each crime scene may provide valuable information for investigators in piecing together the sequence of events.
Policy Claim or Claim of Policy(Apex)
Crime increased, the congressman proposed new gun legislation.
is not a crime. before the point of ratification (or the coming in to force) of a price of legislation that crinalizes conduct...the conduct in question is not crinal.
It depends on the legislation of the country, but generally it is an offence to interfere with the mail.
They can claim to be you, so when they commit crime, they don't get blamed, You do.